Page 85 - DLIS102_LIBRARY_AND_ITS_USERS
P. 85

Library and its Users



                   Notes                5. Creating/presenting: In step five the information or solution is presented to the
                                          appropriate audience in an appropriate format. A paper is written. A presentation is
                                          made. Drawings, illustrations, and graphs are presented.
                                        6. Evaluating: The final step in the Information Literacy strategy involves the critical
                                          evaluation of the completion of the task or the new understanding of the concept. Was
                                          the problem solved? Was new knowledge found? What could have been done differently?
                                          What was done well?
                                 The Big 6 skills have been used in a variety of settings to help those with a variety of needs. For
                                 example, the library of Dubai Women’s College, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates which is an English
                                 as a second language institution, uses the Big6 model for its information literacy workshops.
                                 According to Story-Huffman (2009), using Big6 at the college “has transcended cultural and physical
                                 boundaries to provide a knowledge base to help students become information literate” (para. 8). In
                                 primary grades, Big6 has been found to work well with variety of cognitive and language levels
                                 found in the classroom.
                                 Differentiated instruction and the Big6 appear to be made for each other. While it seems as though
                                 all children will be on the same Big6 step at the same time during a unit of instruction, there is no
                                 reason students cannot work through steps at an individual pace. In addition, the Big 6 process
                                 allows for seamless differentiation by interest.
                                 A number of weaknesses in the Big6 approach have been highlighted by Philip Doty:
                                 This approach is problem-based, is designed to fit into the context of Benjamin Bloom’s taxonomy
                                 of cognitive objectives, and aims toward the development of critical thinking. While the Big6 approach
                                 has a great deal of power, it also has serious weaknesses. Chief among these are the fact that users
                                 often lack well-formed statements of information needs, as well as the model’s reliance on problem-
                                 solving rhetoric. Often, the need for information and its use are situated in circumstances that are
                                 not as well-defined, discrete, and monolithic as problems (Doty, 2003).
                                 Eisenberg (2004) has recognized that there are a number of challenges to effectively applying the
                                 Big 6 skills, not the least of which is information overload which can overwhelm students. Part of
                                 Eisenberg’s solution is for schools to help students become discriminating users of information.

                                 Another conception of information literacy
                                 This conception, used primarily in the library and information studies field, and rooted in the concepts
                                 of library instruction and bibliographic instruction, is the ability “to recognize when information is
                                 needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate and use effectively the needed information”
                                 (Presidential Committee on Information Literacy, 1989, p. 1). In this view, information literacy is
                                 the basis for life-long learning.
                                 In the publication Information power: Building partnerships for learning (AASL and AECT, 1998),
                                 three categories, nine standards, and twenty-nine indicators are used to describe the information
                                 literate student. The categories and their standards are as follows:

                                 Category 1: Information Literacy

                                 Standards:
                                  1.   The student who is information literate accesses information efficiently and effectively.
                                  2.   The student who is information literate evaluates information critically and competently.
                                  3.   The student who is information literate uses information accurately and creatively.









            80                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90