Page 23 - DLIS103_LIBRARY_CLASSIFICATION_AND_CATALOGUING_THEORY
P. 23

Library Classification and Cataloguing Theory


                     Notes         Controlled Vocabulary

                                   While flexible, CC has a somewhat controlled vocabulary. Colon Classification includes, in addition
                                   to the classification rules, schedules that dictate the subject divisions and subdivisions. One of the
                                   criticisms of many classification schemes relates to this controlled vocabulary construct. Controlled
                                   vocabulary ideally allows us to “reconcile all the various possible words that can be used to
                                   express a concept ”. Inevitably in doing so, however, it includes.


                                   2.3  Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC)
                                   Dewey Decimal Classification System (DCC) originally produced in 1876 by Melvil Dewey for a
                                   small North American college library is currently one of the most popular Library Classification
                                   Schemes. DDC is being revised faster than any other Universal scheme and currently is in its 21st
                                   edition.



                                     Did u know? DDC is distributed in Machine-readable Cataloguing (MARC) records produced
                                                by the Library of Congress (LC) and bibliographic utilities like OCLC and RLIN.
                                   DDC is available online (paid service) as Web Dewey and Abridged Web Dewey (DDC 21st ed.).
                                   DDC is also used in the national bibliographies of the UK, Canada, Australia, Italy and other
                                   countries. Research carried out by OCLC in the 1980s established that DDC is a suitable tool for
                                   browsing, first for library catalogues and then for the Internet.

                                   I. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Scheme
                                    The general characteristics and advantages of universal schemes as given earlier are applicable in
                                   the case of DDC. Other characteristics to be noted are as follows:
                                        The scheme is revised more frequently than any other Universal Scheme.
                                        One more flexibility of DDC is that the numbers can be linked to other subject descriptive
                                         systems. For example, the numbers linked to LCSH headings by most major bibliographic
                                         services to the extent that their bibliographic records contain LCSH headings to gather with
                                         DCC and LCC classification data. The USMARC record contains specific tags for several
                                         different classification schemes: DDC, LCC, UDC and NLM together with tags for subject
                                         headings including LCSH and MeSH. Selected new LCSH headings are individually linked
                                         to DDC numbers and are made available via URL.
                                        The USMARC format also allows for links to be made between DDC and other classifica-
                                         tion systems, including LCC, UDC and NLM.
                                        Digital Availability.
                                        Copyright issues: Those who are using the classification can use the notation without
                                         restraints in library catalogues and WWW pages, but use of the other information in the
                                         schedules would require permission from Forest Press.
                                        It is quite clear that a Faceted Classification is more flexible than an Enumerative Classifi-
                                         cation Scheme. Though DDC was devised to be as an Enumerated Scheme, subsequent
                                         revisions have absorbed the structure and methodology of faceted classification and the
                                         use of facet analysis. As a result, subsidiary tables and ‘divide like’ devices that reflect and
                                         can express many aspects of complex topics have been expanded.
                                        Theoretically it could be said that DDC is more flexible than the Library of Congress
                                         Classification and certainly simpler than UDC.





            18                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28