Page 158 - DLIS105_REFERENCE_SOURCES_AND_SERVICES
P. 158

Unit 14: Development of Abstracting Services




            14.3 Governing Laws of Patents                                                           Notes

            The grant and enforcement of patents are governed by national laws, and also by international treaties,
            where those treaties have been given effect in national laws. Patents are, therefore, territorial in nature.
            Commonly, a nation forms a patent office with responsibility for operating that nation’s patent system,
            within the relevant patent laws. The patent office generally has responsibility for the grant of patents,
            with infringement being the remit of national courts. There is a trend towards global harmonization
            of patent laws, with the World Trade Organization (WTO) being particularly active in this area. The
            TRIPs (Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) Agreement has been largely successful
            in providing a forum for nations to agree on an aligned set of patent laws. Conformity with the TRIPs
            agreement is a requirement of admission to the WTO and so compliance is seen by many nations as
            important. This has also led to many developing nations, which may historically have developed
            different laws to aid their development, enforcing patents laws in line with global practice.

            Self Assessment

            Multiple Choice Questions:
             3.   The grant and enforcement of patents are governed by:
                 (a) National laws                     (b) Patents office
                  (c) National governing body          (d) National organisation.
             4.   TRIPS stands for:
                 (a) Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights
                 (b) Trade rational aspects of intellectual proporty rights
                  (c) Trade related aspects of international property rights
                 (d) None of these.


            14.4 Criteria of Evaluation of Software for Libraries

            In any endeavor in which we make a substantial investment of money, energy, and time or other
            resources, we like to know what kind of return we are getting. The ability to evaluate the return on
            our investment gives us the basis on which to choose between alternative. So, an evaluation is basically
            a judgement of worth. It is a matter of comparison of actual result with external standard, in the light
            of existing institutional realities which may be relevant to evaluating the future trajectory of the
            programme or services and provide an objective basis for decision making.
            Software evaluation is quite a difficult task; we have to consider the following procedure, features
            and aids to evaluate software packages.
                  1. Preliminary step:
                    (a) Consult others: You do not want software that stops unexpectedly, slows down on
                        large network, report error message, so consult with other who have already used
                        the software in the same way you intend to use the system or consult other who have
                        already experienced on that software.
                    (b) Who is the advisor: The reputation of person or the institution, his/her experienced
                        on that particular software should also be justified at this point.
                     (c) Reputation of the manufacture and vendor: The reputation of the manufacturer
                        and vendor should also be considered.






                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   153
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163