Page 256 - DLIS001_FOUNDATION_OF_LIBRARY_AND_INFORMATION_SCIENCE
P. 256

Unit 13: Acts Related to Library Legislation




          13.2 Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 (PRB Act)                              Notes

          The Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression to all its citizens.
          Newspapers constitute a potent medium for exercise of this freedom. In our country, the
          publication of newspapers is regulated primarily by the Press and Registration of Books Act,
          1867. The Act seeks to regulate the operation of printing presses and newspapers and registration
          and preservation of copies of such newspapers. Section 5 of the Act lays down the rule under
          which a newspaper may be published, the most important being the requirement of subscribing
          to the printer and publisher thereof the following declaration.
          The Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 is the oldest of the existing Press Laws in India. It
          has been amended in the years of Independence but the amendments have been made to meet
          specific situations. No attempt was made to review the Act in totality and bring it in line with
          the needs and aspirations of the Press in a vibrant democracy like India. There has been no
          demand from the Press for a thorough overhaul of the Act possibly because it is merely regulatory
          in nature, the procedure it lays down may be cumbersome but the penalties are light and in
          many areas the tasks are mentioned but the responsibility for discouraging them is not assigned.
          There are many anomalies in the original Act. These have increased because of amendments
          made from time to time with good intentions, no doubt, but these have further complicated
          matters.
          In its report, the Second Press Commission had made detailed recommendations about changes
          in the Act. In 1988, a Bill amending the Act was introduced in Parliament. There was an outcry
          because the Bill gave sweeping powers to the district authorities to enter the premises of a
          newspaper establishment. There was the natural fear that power-drunk magistrates and police
          might misuse these powers. Before anything could be done to rectify these defects, make the
          procedure for filing the declaration for a newspaper easier and to remove other anomalies in the
          Act and the Bill, the Lok Sabha was dissolved and the Bill died a natural death.

               !
             Caution Busy as successive governments have been with other pressing issues, there has
             been no concrete action about a thorough overhaul of the PRB Act and the press continues
             to be regulated by an archaic piece of legislation which is totally out of tune with prevailing
             conditions and is full of anomalies.
          The anomalies begin with the preamble of the Act itself. It says that the Act is for the regulation
          of printing presses and newspapers, for the preservation of copies of books and newspapers
          printed in India and for the registration of such books and newspapers “What there may have
          been little justification for a common legislation for books and newspapers 133 years ago, in
          today’’ conditions such clubbing together of newspapers and books is ridiculous because their
          needs are totally different. As for preservation, in 1954 the National Libraries Act was passed. It
          was meant specifically for delivery of books and newspapers to the national libraries. One can
          understand that copies of books should be preserved but is it necessary or possible to preserve
          each and every copy of the more than 40,000 newspapers of various frequencies and in various
          languages in India to be preserved. Who is to provide the funds and the space for this exercise?
          Both will increase every year and no Government will be able to provide these. The Act does not
          mention as to who is to preserve the copies of newspapers? The framers of the Act possibly saw
          that the task was impossible and therefore, did not mention the office to perform it. But if the
          task is impossible of performance who continue to retain it in the Act and thus make a mockery
          of it? There is thus an urgent need to remove books from the purview of the Act and also to
          remove the mention about preservation of copies of newspapers.






                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   251
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261