Page 109 - DLIS002_KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION CLASSIFICATION AND CATALOGUING THEORY
P. 109

Knowledge Organization: Classification and Cataloguing Theory




                    Notes
                                     not only to support simple resource browsing but also to underpin vocabulary mapping
                                     and multilingual resource discovery (cf. Slavic, 2006a). In the period 1992-2006, the UDC
                                     was applied in resource organization, for a longer or shorter period of time, in nine
                                     quality subject gateways with an English interface and numerous smaller directories (3).
                                     After 2002, subject gateways using UDC have been more predominant in Central and
                                     Eastern European portals (Stoklasovà, 2003). The general trend in resource discovery on
                                     the Internet is to use classification, in this case UDC, behind a system, as a mapping
                                     mechanism between different indexing systems or languages or as a source of structured
                                     terminology for automatic text processing and categorization. A similar trend could be
                                     said to be present in union library catalogues in library networks with a tradition of and
                                     good practice in UDC use. Here UDC can be more often seen as part of subject authority
                                     data supporting information retrieval via mapping to other classifications or subject heading
                                     systems in more than one language (Balikovà, 2003; Slavic, 2006).
                                     In response to the described changes and needs in information organization and discovery,
                                     the UDC Consortium is considering the improvement and wider dissemination of machine
                                     readable UDC data. Among other things (such as a better structural and semantic linking
                                     of the scheme) this would include a mapping to other special and general classification
                                     systems, multilingual features and exports of UDC data in different standard vocabulary
                                     formats.
                                     Classification user surveys are usually commissioned or conducted by a scheme owner or
                                     publisher. In the case of UDC, and up to 1992, this was the FID. After 1992, monitoring of
                                     the number of users seems to have been left to the individual UDC Consortium members
                                     i.e. publishers holding the rights to publish in a given language; e.g., BSI for English,
                                     Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación (AENOR) for Spanish, Vserossijskij
                                     Institut Nauènoj i Tehnièeskoj Informacii (VINITI) for Russian etc. The UDC Consortium
                                     as their representative body did not publish or disseminate any centrally collated data on
                                     UDC users worldwide. Whatever the reason may be, the fact is that there is no official,
                                     publicly available, estimate of the total number of countries or institutions using UDC in
                                     the period 1992-2006, or for that matter, since the 1980s. Other known sources of survey
                                     data are national or international cataloguing agencies or library networks recording the
                                     use of indexing systems (4). Unfortunately, information on these surveys is hard to access
                                     and merge for such a widely used system as UDC, and it would be almost impossible to
                                     produce any complete or exhaustive account of these data in a shorter period of time. The
                                     background of this research concentrated, therefore, on the last available published survey
                                     data (in English) and several unpublished surveys from the period 1989-2003. Also, there
                                     were a few articles discovered estimating the number of UDC users based on obsolete
                                     data which mainly illustrated and justified the need for new research.
                                     The last published survey on UDC use was on UDC users in the U.K. in 1979–1980 by
                                     Hindson (1981) who established that there were, at the time, 640 libraries using UDC in
                                     the U.K. and Northern Ireland (out of 2,895). Later articles and papers operate with numbers
                                     published in the 1980s and earlier. Thus Sukiasyan (1988: 69) reports that the broad library
                                     network in the former USSR consisted of 300,000 libraries and the UDC was used as an
                                     obligatory system only in scientific-technical libraries. Gilchrist (1992) refers to the FID
                                     survey from 1968 which reported that there were a total of 100,000 users, mostly in the
                                     USSR, European countries, Latin America and Japan. Based on articles from the 1980s,
                                     which largely recycled even older information, Nilbe (1997) reached a count of 60 countries
                                     and 100,000 institutions using UDC worldwide. Information on the very last (unpublished)
                                     FID survey was discovered in the report of the Task Force for UDC System Development
                                     from February 1990 which briefly mentioned a UDC user survey conducted in
                                     1988–1989(5). Apparently, the purpose of this survey was both to get information on who
                                                                                                         Contd....



          104                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114