Page 72 - DLIS401_METHODOLOGY_OF_RESEARCH_AND_STATISTICAL_TECHNIQUES
P. 72

Unit 4: Historical and Experimental Research Methods




          Candidates re-orient their arguments and thematic selections in part by the signals sent by  Notes
          voters. One must also consider the interference of other kinds of input on electoral propaganda
          such as internal and external political crises and the arbitrary interference of private interests
          on the dispute. Moments of internal crisis in disputes between candidates might result from
          the exhaustion of a certain strategy. The moments of exhaustion might consequently precipitate
          an inversion in the thematic flux.
          As an evaluation approach, content analysis is considered by some to be quasi-evaluation
          because content analysis judgments need not be based on value statements if the research
          objective is aimed at presenting subjective experiences. Thus, they can be based on knowledge
          of everyday lived experiences. Such content analyses are not evaluations. On the other hand,
          when content analysis judgements are based on values, such studies are evaluations.
          As demonstrated above, only a good scientific hypothesis can lead to the development of a
          methodology that will allow the empirical description, be it dynamic or static.




             Notes Evaluations focused on assesing program quality, implementation and impact to
                 provide feedback and information for internal improvement, without external
                 consequences, are called formative evaluation.


          4.5    Uses and Process of Content Analysis

          Ole Holsti (1969) groups 15 uses of content analysis into three basic categories:
          •    make inferences about the antecedents of a communication

          •    describe and make inferences about characteristics of a communication
          •    make inferences about the effects of a communication.
          He also places these uses into the context of the basic communication paradigm.

          The following table shows fifteen uses of content analysis in terms of their general purpose,
          element of the communication paradigm to which they apply, and the general question they
          are intended to answer.

          Uses of Content Analysis by Purpose, Communication Element, and Question

          Purpose                Element       Question    Use
          Make inferences        Source        Who?        • Answer questions of disputed
          about the antecedents                              authorship  (authorship  analysis)
          of communications
                                 Encoding      Why?        • Secure political & military
                                 process                     intelligence
                                                           • Analyze traits of individuals
                                                           • Infer cultural aspects & change
                                                           • Provide legal & evaluative
                                                             evidence
          Describe & make        Channel       How?        •  Analyze techniques of inferences
          of communications                                  about persuasion the characteristics


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    67
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77