Page 241 - DLIS402_INFORMATION_ANALYSIS_AND_REPACKAGING
P. 241

Information Analysis and Repackaging



                   Notes         The two most common sets of terms consulted by image collection organizers are the Art and
                                 Architecture Thesaurus and ICONCLASS. The AAT was created by the Art History Information
                                 Program (AHIP) and is trademark of the J. Paul Getty Trust. The AAT contains extensive art and
                                 architecture terms (although it does “skimp” on the terms used to describe images in the fine arts).
                                 It is organized in a hierarchical way, lists words with definitions, and contains notes on usage.
                                 The AAT provides a flexible base for “defining” an image. Most image collections that use the AAT
                                 use it as a supplement of some sort in conjunction with other vocabulary lists they have created for
                                 their individual collections. ICONCLASS, on the other hand, is not as flexible: “[ICONCLASS] takes
                                 everything, absolutely everything, you can think of. Then divides it into one hierarchical and
                                 interlocking set of broad categories with examples.” ICONCLASS was developed by Professor H.
                                 Van der Waal to deal with the traditional iconography of art history. It contains codes that represent
                                 various iconographic elements used in cataloguing descriptions. The codes are difficult to remember
                                 (you have to look them up in the nine volume set), and because of the interlocking nature of the
                                 system, additional codes are difficult to incorporate. Cataloguers cannot always say what they want
                                 to say using these codes.

                                 Conclusion
                                 It is clear that there is a need for a universal vocabulary and authority control in image collections.
                                 Many computerized projects have experienced problems in trying to define what information should
                                 be contained in specific fields (e.g., What do you put in the location field? Do you use the location of
                                 the object depicted in the image, or the location of the holding institution, or maybe the location of
                                 the stored surrogate image?). The problem of what type of vocabulary to use in the description of
                                 art or architectural images has not really been addressed in the on-line image systems we have
                                 seen.
                                 Controlled vocabulary and authority have been more of an issue for individual image collections.
                                 Controlling the vocabulary used is a very important aspect of future organization of advanced
                                 image collections. The realization that standards were needed not only for consistency within one’s
                                 own image collection but also for future collaborations with other institutions’ image collections
                                 resulted in the creation of the AAT and ULAN. Additional projects are also in progress, such as the
                                 Visual Resources Association project to develop standards for descriptive elements. Conforming to
                                 the vocabulary used in ULAN and the AAT are both good beginnings. However, if AAT is to be
                                 used for future cataloguing, the terms will need to be expanded. Still, I feel the AAT is the most
                                 useful tool for describing art, architecture, and museum objects, and for controlling the consistency
                                 of vocabulary in database indexes.

                                 Vocabulary Control Tools

                                 All STAR applications provide for controlled vocabularies for subject headings, personal and
                                 corporate names, places, products, and classes - any field where input can be selected from a finite
                                 list.
                                 Customers can control the content of their vocabulary authority databases and create new authorities
                                 using the built-in tools—for standalone use or use with STAR applications, such as those in the
                                 Knowledge Management and Library Automation product families. Both flat authority files and
                                 ANSI standard thesauri are supported.
                                 STAR/Thesaurus follows the ANSI/NISO Z39.19-1993 Standard. It supports the use of imported
                                 thesauri and taxonomies, as well as the creation of new hierarchical vocabularies.

                                 Vocabulary Control
                                 As discussed earlier, the installation and effective operation of an autonomous IS depends in practice
                                 on tight vocabulary control through the use of a rigid syntax and restricted lexicon. The effect this
                                 has is to very tightly constrain the range of possible directions a conversation can take, and to limit




            236                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246