Page 78 - DLIS405_INFORMATION_STORAGE_AND_RETRIEVAL
P. 78

Jovita Kaur, Lovely Professional University                                             Unit 8: Indexing



                                                                                                   Notes
                                       Unit 8: Indexing




              CONTENTS
              Objectives

              Introduction

               8.1  Indexing Development
                    8.1.1 Indexing Process

               8.2  Index Development and Trends

               8.3  Summary
               8.4  Keywords

               8.5  Review Questions
               8.6  Further Readings


          Objectives

          After studying this unit, you will be able to:
           •  Define indexing development
           •  Describe index development and trends
           •  Explain design phase and development phase.

          Introduction

          Indexing is depending both on the document to be indexed and on the indexer performing the process
          under specific conditions in a specific environment. Different documents are of course indexed
          differently by the same indexer. If they were not the index would be non-discriminative and total
          useless. Any theory of indexing has to deal with this fact and thus with how document attributes or
          properties should influence its representation.
          The same document may be indexed differently by different indexers or by the same indexer at
          different times or by different indexing systems or in different libraries, for different target groups
          or for different ideal purposes.
          The indexing is close to the document if it is constructed by a set of terms selected mechanically
          from the document (e.g. from titles, references or full-text). This is the objective pole because the
          document is the object of the indexing process. Also the rhetorical view of indexing (Andersen
          2004) is close to the objective pole emphasizing what the author of the document is arguing.
          The subjective pole of indexing theory emphases that the same document may be seen differently
          by different people or systems and that the indexing should not aim at a purely objective
          representation but should also consider, for example, the collection to which the document belongs
          or the tasks for which the indexing is made. Automatic indexing usually represent the terms of a
          document relative to the terms frequency in a collection of documents. In this way is the
          representation not just a function of the document itself, but also a function of a collection.



                                            LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   73
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83