Page 146 - DENG105_ELECTIVE_ENGLISH_II
P. 146

Unit 11: Of Revenge by Francis Bacon




          principles.” However, it is one thing to collect instances in order to compare species and show  Notes
          a relationship among them; it is quite another to theorize a mechanism, namely evolution by
          mutation and natural selection, that elegantly and powerfully explains their entire history and
          variety.)

          Science, that is to say, does not, and has probably never advanced according to the strict,
          gradual, ever-plodding method of Baconian observation and induction. It proceeds instead by
          unpredictable—and often intuitive and even (though Bacon would cringe at the word) imaginative—
          leaps and bounds. Kepler used Tycho’s scrupulously gathered data to support his own heart-
          felt and even occult belief that the movements of celestial bodies are regular and symmetrical,
          composing a true harmony of the spheres. Galileo tossed unequal weights from the Leaning
          Tower as a mere public demonstration of the fact (contrary to Aristotle) that they would fall
          at the same rate. He had long before satisfied himself that this would happen via the very
          un-Bacon-like method of mathematical reasoning and deductive thought-experiment. Harvey,
          by a similar process of quantitative analysis and deductive logic, knew that the blood must
          circulate, and it was only to provide proof of this fact that he set himself the secondary task
          of amassing empirical evidence and establishing the actual method by which it did so.
          One could enumerate – in true Baconian fashion – a host of further instances. But the point
          is already made: advances in scientific knowledge have not been achieved for the most part
          via Baconian induction (which amounts to a kind of systematic and exhaustive survey of
          nature supposedly leading to ultimate insights) but rather by shrewd hints and guesses – in
          a word by hypotheses – that are then either corroborated or (in Karl Popper’s important term)
          falsified by subsequent research.
          In summary, then, it can be said that Bacon underestimated the role of imagination and
          hypothesis (and overestimated the value of minute observation and bee-like data collection)
          in the production of new scientific knowledge. And in this respect it is true that he wrote of
          science like a Lord Chancellor, regally proclaiming the benefits of his own new and supposedly
          foolproof technique instead of recognizing and adapting procedures that had already been
          tested and approved. On the other hand, it must be added that Bacon did not present himself
          (or his method) as the final authority on the investigation of nature or, for that matter, on any
          other topic or issue relating to the advance of knowledge. By his own admission, he was but
          the Buccinator, or “trumpeter,” of such a revolutionary advance – not the founder or builder
          of a vast new system, but only the herald or announcing messenger of a new world to come.

          11.3   Reputation and Cultural Legacy


          If anyone deserves the title “universal genius” or “Renaissance man” (accolades traditionally
          reserved for those who make significant, original contributions to more than one professional
          discipline or area of learning), Bacon clearly merits the designation. Like Leonardo and Goethe,
          he produced important work in both arts and science. Like Cicero, Marcus Aurelius, Benjamin
          Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson, he combined wide and ample intellectual and literary interests
          (from practical rhetoric and the study of nature to moral philosophy and educational reform)
          with a substantial political career. Like his near contemporary Machiavelli, he excelled in a
          variety of literary genres – from learned treatises to light entertainments – though, also like
          the great Florentine writer, he thought of himself mainly as a political statesman and practical
          visionary: a man whose primary goal was less to obtain literary laurels for himself than to
          mold the agendas and guide the policy decisions of powerful nobles and heads of state.

          In our own era Bacon would be acclaimed as a “public intellectual,” though his personal
          record of service and authorship would certainly dwarf the achievements of most academic



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   141
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151