Page 33 - DENG202_ELECTIVE_ENGLISH_III
P. 33

Elective English—III




                    Notes              Chitra/Chitrângadâ: Daughter of the King of Manipur, Chitrângadâ was raised as a boy
                                       due to the lack of a male heir.

                                       Assorted villagers
                                       Arjuna: A prince of the house of Kurus, Arjuna is a former warrior that is living as a hermit
                                       as of the start of the play.

                                   3.4 Critical Analysis of ‘Chitra’

                                   “I am Chitra, the daughter of the Kingly house of Manipur” utters the princess in this play as she
                                   reveals herself, to the Gods. Undoubtedly this indicate the key to her whole character which is
                                   at once frank and dignified, free as well as self-poised. Born as a woman, she has none of the
                                   untaught arts of look and language of her sex. The simplicity of her speech draws us to her as
                                   much as the purity of her soul. We admire her when she spurns the boon of a God that has made
                                   her person lovely as she craves the perfection of the spirit even more than that of the body. She
                                   appears all the more radiant in her knowledge of true love; for hers “has no touch of earth”. Her
                                   hero and Lord, Arjuna, stands almost a contrast before her even as “the low sun that makes the
                                   colour”.

                                   Rabindranath Tagore has wonderfully divined this short drama containing a thoughtful
                                   suggestion capable of capturing readers for long. For he alone knows to weave with consummate
                                   skill, “an endless meaning in the narrow span of a song”, The whole purport of this drama
                                   strikes us as original both in form and substance. The anguish of Love when it fails in its
                                   expectation of a higher purpose awakens in us the sense of the futility of much that passes for
                                   that noble quality in this world. All that is given us, we begin to realise, is only the shadow. The
                                   psychological factor playing a significant part in this play cannot fail to whet the edge of our
                                   enjoyment, when the poet robes it in the ineffable sweetness of his language with the powerful
                                   aids of fancy and feeling.
                                   There is not much wealth of detail or warmth of expression to engage us here. It is almost all the
                                   narration by either Arjuna to himself or Chitra to the God of Love, of their respective thoughts
                                   and hopes of the other. We are not often treated to situations wherein Arjuna and Chitra are
                                   wrapped up in ecstasy. Yet our heart’s desires receive ample fulfilment from the unlimited
                                   scope for conjuring up the felicity of love from their own speeches which impress us with the
                                   indescribable charm of delicacy. Critics may find this drama too short to deserve the name. But
                                   the true lover of art will scarcely pass without realising that the rare suggestion in Rabindranath
                                   answers for the perfect enjoyment which we may derive from a complete play of many acts.

                                   To minds, which often receive real sustenance from the infinite variety and unstinted flow of
                                   expressions vivifying and portraying to us the depths of love, jealousy, disappointment, and
                                   revenge, which the immortal characters of Shakespeare illustrate, the comparatively little
                                   soliloquy or the brief passages wherein Arjuna and Chitra are made to reveal themselves in this
                                   play, may not have any great appeal. But this is perhaps where Tagore’s genius distinguishes
                                   itself by its singular chasteness and individuality. It is truly the product of the Oriental
                                   imagination. The tendency of art and activity in the West is expansive while in the East it has
                                   shown an immense concentration and singleness of purpose. Her love at first sight when described
                                   by Chitra to the God Madan, has no more ado about it than the typically simple language,
                                   devoid of the colour and detail, naturally imported by poets in order to evoke our emotions.
                                   “Ah, foolish heart! whither fled thy presumption. I know not in what whirlpool of thought I was
                                   lost,” says the princess indeed conveying to us more than adequately the sudden gush of fresh
                                   impulses in her heart which deprived her of the power of speech. Really nothing more is
                                   required to keep the reader alive to the springs of love bubbling in her virgin soul. Nay, the
                                   imagination can fill in the rest left unsaid by her. The mind enjoys the refreshing device of
                                   the poet that has opened up for it a vista of love’s longings by one gentle stroke of the pen.



          28                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38