Page 111 - DPOL201_WESTERN_POLITICAL_THOUGHT_ENGLISH
P. 111

Unit 6: Thomas Hobbes


              At an international conference held in Helsinki in 1987, an important consensus emerged  Notes
              among scholars that the proposition of a world state might be absurd and premature, for
              nation states would continue as long as humanity remained concerned with the right of self-
              preservation and the need to secure commodious living. These observations vindicated the
              essential postulates of Hobbes’ paradigm, and reiterated its relevance for times to come.
          •   In summation, the twentieth century with its complexities and problems has made it possible
              to appreciate the concerns that Hobbes exhibited namely power, peace and science. There
              was an interest in trying to understand the “power relations, necessary, possible and desirable
              between men”, for Hobbes was the first to lay down the science of power politics. We share
              Hobbes’ concern in trying to devise ways and means for ensuring order and commodious
              living. Above all, we share and appreciate his method of science. However, the modern
              world values the rule of law, rather than the person who really wields it, and in this sense
              Hobbes’ prescriptions were pre-modern. The modern view of power is also different, as
              Persons remarked, power in modern society is more like money. It is a functional category
              like others thus differing considerably from Hobbes’ notion. Moreover, with the democratic
              revolution of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, struggle for power has been replaced
              with struggle for recognition, thereby drastically modifying the role of the singular,
              personalized sovereign. But for understanding this historic transformation of humankind,
              an understanding of Hobbes is an essential prerequisite.

          6.7 Key-Words

          1. An unaccountable sovereign  :  A person or group empowered to decide every social and
                                         political issue.
          2. Right of Judicator        :  Of hearing and deciding all controversies.

          6.8 Review Questions

          1. Critically examine the concept of individualism.
          2. Explain the Hobbes, Social Contract.
          3. What are Hobbes views of Social Contract? Explain.
          4. Explain Hobbes views on the rights and duties of the sovereign.
          Answers: Self-Assessment
              1. 1651                        2. Thucydides                 3. Leviathan
              4. 1655
          6.9 Further Readings




                       1.  Mukherjee, S. and Ramaswamy, S. 2004: A History of Political Thought, PHI
                          Learning Pvt. Ltd.
                       2.  Mukhopadhyay, A.K. 1990 Western Political Thought, Calcutta - KP Bagchi and
                          Company.











                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       105
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116