Page 262 - DPOL201_WESTERN_POLITICAL_THOUGHT_ENGLISH
P. 262

Western Political Thought


                    Notes


                                            Mill’s plea for gender equality was appreciated by Bankim, who felt that there was no
                                            need to add anything to what was stated in The Subjection, except the fact that Indian
                                            women faced “one hundredth degree more of subjugation” than their European
                                            counterparts.


                                   Self-Assessment
                                   1. Mill advocated universal adult franchise in ............... .
                                       (i) 1859          (ii) 1850          (iii) 1858          (iv) 1860
                                   2. Stuart Mill visualized society as composed of ............... citizens.
                                       (i) Free                              (ii) Equal and independent
                                      (iii) Virtuous                        (iv) All of these
                                   3. Mill started writing a book on socialism, which remained incomplete, in ............... .
                                       (i) 1869          (ii) 1870          (iii) 1865          (iv) 1868
                                   4. ‘Samya’ was written by
                                       (i) Bankim        (ii) Mill          (iii) Macaulay      (iv) None of these.
                                   14.4 Summary

                                   •    Mill was convinced that a good society was one which consisted of happy people, and
                                        happiness came out of self-reliance, rationality, tolerance, wide-ranging interests and a
                                        compassionate temper. For Mill, “coercion is logically at odds with the creation of such a
                                        character”. Self-development and moral progress were instrumental to such a good life,
                                        leading to “the establishment of the life of the individual as a work of art”. This was only
                                        possible where coercion, in the name of either class or gender, was eliminated, if not
                                        minimized. Mill, the rationalist and the Utilitarian, was also the philosopher of human
                                        liberation, individuality, equality and fulfilment.
                                   •    Mill accepted the Industrial Revolution, for it produced a class of energetic and acquisitive
                                        entrepreneurs with the sole aim of the profit motive and the accumulation of money. He
                                        feared mass democracy because of its collective mediocrity, which would destroy higher
                                        civilization. He was fearful of mass conformity and the effect it would have on individual
                                        freedom. He favoured a society based on just meritocracy. He was not appreciative of the
                                        destruction unleashed by the French Revolution, though he was happy at the decimation of
                                        the monarchy and nobility, and at the reduction of the influence and role of the Church. He
                                        assigned an important role to the intellectual elite in shaping and making the attitudes and
                                        beliefs in a society, particularly in times of transition. He also insisted on the need to correlate
                                        political institutions with society.
                                   •    Mill distinguished between the public sphere of law and the private sphere of morality, and
                                        the need to guarantee by law basic human freedoms. He also established the relationship
                                        between law and liberty, whereby law as a system maximized liberty, namely self-
                                        development. He clearly saw the need to establish a large ambit of freedom, while emphasizing
                                        some restraints, both as a condition of social life, and for protecting freedom itself. He was
                                        not indifferent to conduct that fell short of accepted standards of private morality. He also
                                        advocated proportional representation as a device to protect the rights of the minorities,
                                        giving them an opportunity to share power. He championed the right to express one’s opinion,
                                        it being immaterial whether one was right or wrong. The important thing was free expression
                                        and articulation of contesting opinions. He refined and developed Voltaire’s defence of free


          256                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   257   258   259   260   261   262   263