Page 258 - DPOL202_COMPARATIVE_POLITICS_AND_GOVERNMENT_ENGLISH
P. 258

Javeed Ahmad Bhat, Lovely Professional University                                   Unit 11: Pressure Groups



                                Unit 11: Pressure Groups                                           Notes




            CONTENTS
            Objectives
            Introduction
            11.1 Meaning and Nature of a Pressure Groups
            11.2 Difference between Political Parties and Pressure Groups
            11.3 Kinds and Role of Pressure Groups
            11.4 Summary
            11.5 Key-Words
            11.6 Review Questions
            11.7 Further Readings


          Objectives

          After studying this unit students will be able to:
          •    Understand the Meaning and Nature of a Pressure Groups.
          •    Know the Difference between Political Parties and Pressure Groups.
          •    Discuss the Kinds and Role of Pressure Groups.
          Introduction

          Recent studies of the role of pressure groups in the sphere of modern empirical political theory have
          appeared as a refined version of the philosophical and deductive theories of pluralism. Here the
          atomistic liberalism of Locke and the idealistic collectivism of Green that had their clear manifestation
          in the works of great pluralists like Figgis, Maitland, Cole and Laski have been replaced by, what
          may be called, analytical pluralism of David Truman, V.O. Key, Jr. and Earl Latham who have taken
          inspiration from Bentley’s The Process of Government published in 1908. The group theorists, as they
          are called, take it for granted that society is a mosaic of numerous groups living in interaction with
          each other. Curiously, the groups make claims on the government and the government, in turn, acts
          as the adjuster or the balancer of the interests of the social groups. The result is that each of the major
          social groups “tends to associate itself with a distinctive interpretation of politics or ideology.” The
          emphasis on the dynamics as well as the processes in group theory “is essentially a criticism of the
          formalism and static quality of the institutional approach to political analysis that was prevalent in
          the early phase of the twentieth century. In addition, the tenacious insistence of group theorists on
          the central position of the group was a reaction not only to the atomistic individualism of the so-
          called classical liberals but also to a kind of simple psychologism that purported to deal with social
          events in terms of human ideas and ideals without a very adequate theory of perception.
          11.1 Meaning and Nature of a Pressure Groups

          The politics of pressure groups hinges on the psychological foundation of self-interest. It is the cardinal
          factor of self-interest that forces men to be in unison with other ‘like-minded’ ones in order to enhance
          their position and power to the point of gaining recognition, legitimisation and realisation of their
          specific interest. That is, it depends upon the fact that “a man’s skin sits closer to him than his shirt.
          And so men think more carefully, as a rule, about their immediate concern than about their general
          welfare; they are more likely to perceive their own interests in politics than the larger framework.
          “However, the interests of a man are many and multifold. He lives not in a ‘universe’ but in a
          'multiverse’ of interests, unless he is a recluse or a man living away from the life of his community.


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       253
   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263