Page 275 - DPOL202_COMPARATIVE_POLITICS_AND_GOVERNMENT_ENGLISH
P. 275

Comparative Politics and Government


                    Notes          1.   Here is emphasis on the importance of individual rights, especially the inviolability of
                                        individual’s property and the necessity of limiting the powers of government to protect these
                                        rights. Liberal-democracy implies not only an extension of the franchise but an equality of
                                        voting rights. The representative represents individuals, their opinions and their interests, and
                                        therefore he is elected according to geographically demarcated constituencies and not according
                                        to classes, occupational distinctions or distinct social interests.
                                   2.   Man is a rational being and he can identify his own opinions; he is also aware of the wider
                                        claims of the community. He will, therefore, use his vote in an intelligent manner and is
                                        consequently entitled to share in the selection of the representatives.
                                   3.   There should be universal adult franchise, secret ballot and fair and free periodic elections.
                                        Constituencies should be earmarked for the recruitment of the representatives acting according
                                        to the will of their electors; the business of the elected assembly is to protect the interests of its
                                        constituents against any encroachment made by the executive or by the majority acting in the
                                        name of ‘general good’.





                                                The authority of the representative is not only created by the constituent power, but
                                                it is subject to change by the amending power under the constitution.”

                                   Opposed to this is the theory of representation as given by the socialists or collectivists whose salient
                                   features may be thus pointed out:
                                   1.   Emphasis should be laid not on the individual but on the class. The assemblies should represent
                                        not the individuals and their opinions but the majority class whose interests have been
                                        subordinated by middle-class parliaments.
                                   2.   Democracy means the presence of social equality and absence of economic exploitation.
                                        Representation should, thus, be governed by this important consideration.
                                   3.   There may be different parties and groups to represent social interests in the pre-socialist period;
                                        there must be only one party when the era of socialism is ushered in. The existence of the
                                        Communist party alone is justified on the ground of the absence of class conflicts.
                                   As claimed by the writers in the socialist countries, their representative system differs from a bourgeois
                                   system in matters of principle. They deprecate the bourgeois representative system as a process of
                                   growing emasculation and limitation and instead admire their own system as being dependent upon
                                   the line of popular self-government and self-administration the model of which can be seen in the
                                   Soviets of the former USSR and the communes of China. Socialist countries have also adopted a
                                   number of direct democratic devices and institutions such as method of recall, rural and town meetings,
                                   system of imperative mandate, role of social activists, popular initiative of legislation and the like so
                                   as to demonstrate that it ‘’should be a distortion of the institution of socialist representation if all
                                   these existing traits were ignored in a study of the organs of state power, the representative institutions.
                                   It is thus maintained that socialist representation is a form of indirect democracy which is increasingly
                                   completed with a series of direct democratic institutions, and which is absorbing these institutions or
                                   part of them.”
                                   Two important points strike us here from what we have discussed above. First, it is not easy to define
                                   the term ‘representation’ in a precise manner. Differences exist as to whether needs and common
                                   values of the whole community or with particular needs of the individuals or special interests of the
                                   social class in conflict wiht each other. Acute differences in view also exist on the point as to which
                                   individuals, groups or parties are to be considered as genuine representatives and what kind of
                                   people ought to be chosen to act for others. Second, the political  representatives should in no sense
                                   be treated as  ‘duplicate of the average citizens.



          270                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280