Page 337 - DPOL202_COMPARATIVE_POLITICS_AND_GOVERNMENT_ENGLISH
P. 337

Comparative Politics and Government


                    Notes          6.   It is not dissolving the state, but it has not left the state untouched either. New role of state in
                                        super-territorial sphere should be examined.
                                   7.   It highlights interdependence of states in the international sphere.
                                   After the disintegration of the Red Empire (USSR) in 1991, signifying the end of the Cold War, a new
                                   world has emerged and globalisation is its ideology. According to the United Nations Development
                                   Report, 1999, the ‘world has changed.’




                                                Globalisation refers to processes whereby social relations require relatively
                                                distanceless and borderless qualities, so that human lives are increasingly played
                                                out in the world as a single place.

                                   14.2 Globalisation and Comparative Politics


                                   We have seen that globalisation is the ‘ideology’ of today having its definite impact on the socio-
                                   cultural; economic and political spheres. For our purpose, the political dimension of globalisation is
                                   particularly important. ‘It has affected the nature and working of the nation-state system and is
                                   creating conditions for global governance. Its implications have their own significance in the domain
                                   of comparative politics. The impact of globalisation on the operation of the state system may be seen
                                   in these directions:
                                   1.   Modern state is regarded as a sovereign entity which, according to the interpretations of Hobbes,
                                        Austin and Hegel is omnipotent. Globalisation has put a check on this assumption. The autonomy
                                        of the states has been restricted to a considerable extent. They have to follow the directives of
                                        international bodies like the World Trade Organisation, International Monetary Fund, World
                                        Bank and the like. The nation-state is still a sovereign entity, but its sovereignty stands eroded
                                        to a certain extent that is identified with their ‘loss of control’. In a true sense, it is not a diminution
                                        of legal and actual control over the process of determining policy directions, but rather a
                                        diminution of their capacity to achieve these policies once they have been set.
                                   2.   In the economic sphere, globalisation has created the model of a contracted and atrophied state.
                                        As a result of the de-territorialisation of the nation-state, products and capital of rich countries
                                        flow with least hindrance. The leaders of the multi-national corporations influence the policy-
                                        makers of the poor and backward countries and their track-II diplomacy constrains the autonomy
                                        of the planners of such states. It is endorsed in the UN Document that “national borders are also
                                        breaking down in economic policy as multilateral agreements and the pressures of staying
                                        competitive in global markets constrain the options for national policy and as multinational
                                        corporations and global crime syndicates integrate their operation globally.”
                                   3.   The growing trend of globalisation has strengthened the case of ‘new social movements’ which
                                        desire to establish a ‘civil society’ in the countries of the world where it is non-existent. The
                                        movements of the human rights activists, the environmentalists and the feminists may be referred
                                        to at this stage. Not only this, the powerful states of the world have invented the plea of interfering
                                        in the internal affairs of a weak state in the name of protecting human rights there, or destroying
                                        the forces of ‘terrorism’ sheltered there that pose a serious threat to the life and property of the
                                        people living in other parts of the world.
                                   4.   Globalisation is creating a transnational state with trans-national citizenship. As the people of
                                        one stock move and settle down in some other country as citizens, in the words of W.Kymlicka,
                                        a kind of multi-cultural citizenship comes up. If the citizens of one West European country may
                                        reside, serve and settle down permanently in any other country belonging to the European
                                        Union, he would naturally have the benefit of post-national or trans-national citizenship in
                                        course of time. If this process goes on unchecked, a day may come when Goldsmith’s dream of
                                        ‘man’s citizenship of the world’ and Tagore’s vision of a ‘universal man’ become a reality.


          332                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342