Page 21 - DSOC201_SOCIAL_STRUCTURE_AND_SOCIAL_CHANGE_ENGLISH
P. 21

Social Structure and Social Change


                    Notes          social structure. These have been attacked from time to time by social and religious reform
                                   movements, secularization process and host of others. But the system seems to have a remarkable
                                   resilience. It yields some ground but returns again. For instance, when caste is sought to be
                                   dislodged from the religious (ritual) domain, it enters into the political process and caste
                                   consciousness comes back with a vengeance through urbanization. In the face of scientific temper,
                                   religiosity and ritualism also increased and a substantial segment of the modern educated class
                                   shows latent and sometime overt acceptance of the religious phenomenon sometimes steeped in
                                   irrationality and superstition. Moreover, even the religious ideologies that emerged outside India
                                   such as Islam and Christianity too accept some of these attributes and become Indianized’. The
                                   joint family norms instead of fading away in the face of urbanization and industrialization may
                                   still be retained by adapting to the process of democratization and acceptance of dissent. The joint
                                   family today is more democratic and the traditional autocratic authority of the karta (head of the
                                   joint family) has become a thing of the past. All these examples point to the fact that what is being
                                   continued is a transformed version-of the past, When a Clifford Geertz talks about “Old Societies,
                                   New states”, he has a point.
                                   Another dimension of continuity in Indian society may be explained through the continuity of
                                   Little Traditions’ with Great Traditions. Even among the modern, educated urban people, during
                                   sickness in the family, a modern physician visits the patient in the morning and the same family
                                   takes recourse to sorcery ganda and taveez (amcelet) bhabhut from the so called godmen, swamis and
                                   babas, Pirs and faqirs. A common sight in any Indian village is the puja for the tractor bought by a
                                   farmer, invoking the blessings of the local deity, performing  aarti and applying  sindoor to the
                                   tractor, a product of modern technology. Not only the continuity between the Little Traditions and
                                   Great Traditions, even two different Great Traditions may go together or get fused into one
                                   another. For the vast multitudes of the Hindu masses paying respect to the mazar of a Sufi saint
                                   alongwith praying in a temple is not unusual or mutually contradictory. It does not dilute their
                                   Hindutua. The contribution of a number of Muslims to the Shastriya Sangeet is well known and a
                                   number of these musicians have been paying their respect to Saraswati before starting their daily
                                   riyaz (practice) of music both vocal as well as instrumental. Ustad Bismillah Khan playing Shehnai
                                   on the thresh hold of Kashi Vishwanath temple immediately after performing Haj at Mecca is a
                                   pleasant sight to many. It tells us that there is something inherent in Indian civilization, which
                                   facilitates the cultural continuity.
                                   Among the factors of change in Indian society discussed in this section, independence from British
                                   rule, democratization, adult franchise, constitution as a vehicle of change (state sponsored change),
                                   industrialization and urbanization, modern education and increase in education, legislative and
                                   administrative means may be the most important factors of change. At the grassroots level,
                                   industrialization and market economy has led to breakdown of Jajmani system. Urbanization has
                                   contributed to the increased occupational mobility and disorganization of joint family at least
                                   structurally, new system of stratification based on achievement rather than ascription has emerged.
                                   But, as pointed out elsewhere in this section, these changes have not taken place through wholesale
                                   replacement of traditional structures. But the craving for retaining and strengthening the traditional
                                   social institutions such as caste and religion along with modernization pose a threat of breakdown
                                   or ‘cultural lag’ to the process of modernization. The increasing level of communalism and casteism
                                   along with violence, use of modern technology like television to promote religious animosity and
                                   growth of separatism may be cited as examples. The active participation of the affluent urban
                                   middle class in looting spree and in the communal violence in the Gujarat’s recent holocaust speak
                                   volumes of communalisation of this modern urban middle class. Increased ritualism, religiosity
                                   and religious consciousness and an upbeat economy, democracy and declining levels of tolerance
                                   of dissent, an open polity with atrocities on the weaker sections, high spiritualism with increasing
                                   vulgarisation of values are alarming to the students of contemporary Indian society. As S.C. Dube
                                   (1990) remarks, contemporary Indian society is undergoing a trauma of change and is confronting
                                   a series of dilemmas and paradoxes. While some aspects of tradition will survive because of their
                                   vitality and usefulness, many of the scaly prejudices of the past will have to be eradicated and
                                   structures of exploitation and tyranny demolished. The road ahead is long, the process may be
                                   painful, but every citizen of India has a stake in the future.


          16                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26