Page 240 - DSOC201_SOCIAL_STRUCTURE_AND_SOCIAL_CHANGE_ENGLISH
P. 240

Unit 10: Social Change


          Additionally, competition may lead to growth in the size and complexity of the entities involved. The  Notes
          classic example of this process, as first suggested by Adam Smith, is the tendency in capitalism toward
          collusion and the establishment of monopolies when small firms are driven out of the competitive
          marketplace. Another example came from Norbert Elias, who suggested that western European nation-
          states were born out of competitive struggles between feudal lords. Competition also dominates
          theories of individualism, in which social change is seen as the result of individuals pursuing their
          self-interest. Game theory and other mathematical devices, however, have shown that individuals
          acting in their own self-interest will in certain conditions cooperate with one another and thereby
          widen the existing social networks.
          Tension and adaptation
          In structural functionalism, social change is regarded as an adaptive response to some tension within
          the social system. When some part of an integrated social system changes, a tension between this and
          other parts of the system is created, which will be resolved by the adaptive change of the other parts.
          An example is what the American sociologist William Fielding Ogburn has called cultural lag, which
          refers in particular to a gap that develops between fast-changing technology and other slower-paced
          sociocultural traits.
          Diffusion

          Diffusion, is the process of the spread of culture from group to group. It has been considered as one
          of the main causes of social change. Diffusion takes place within societies and between societies
          through contact. This is why the process of diffusion becomes difficult to penetrate in a situation of
          isolation. Jazz, which was originated among black musicians of New Orleans diffused to other groups
          within the society, and then later spread to other societies as well and to different parts of the world.
          Social movement is certainly one of the most important factors of social change. We can understand
          social movement into two different forms- one, those movements organised to create some new social
          forms that are usually radical and liberal in nature; and two, those movements concerned with
          maintaining or recreating older social forms that are generally conservative or reactionary. However,
          in both these cases, social change will depend much on the success of the movements and the impact
          it could cause to the society.
          Revolutionary movement may be considered as a kind of social movement. Revolutionary movements
          also cause social change. The French Revolution of 1789 witnessed the rise of French democracy, rise
          of modern civilian army, and was a great eye-opener and model for many peoples in different parts
          of   the  world who are struggling for liberation and justice. The Russian Revolution is also another
          example of revolutionary change that brought an end to monarchical government and class
          stratification in Russia.
          Diffusion of innovations
          Some social changes result from the innovations that are adopted in a society. These can include
          technological inventions, new scientific knowledge, new beliefs, or a new fashion in the sphere of
          leisure. Diffusion is not automatic but selective; an innovation is adopted only by people who are
          motivated to do so. Furthermore, the innovation must be compatible with important aspects of the
          culture. One reason for the adoption of innovations by larger groups is the example set by higher-
          status groups which act as reference groups for other people. Many innovations tend to follow a
          pattern of diffusion from higher to lower-status groups. More specifically, most early adopters of
          innovations in modern Western societies, according to several studies, are young, urban, affluent,
          and highly educated, with a high occupational status. Often they are motivated by the wish to
          distinguish themselves from the crowd. After diffusion has taken place, however, the innovation is
          no longer a symbol of distinction. This motivates the same group to look for something new again.
          This mechanism may explain the succession of fads, fashions, and social movements.
          Planning and institutionalization of change
          Social change may result from goal-directed large-scale social planning. The possibilities for planning
          by government bureaucracies and other large organizations have increased in modern societies. Most


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       235
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245