Page 248 - DSOC201_SOCIAL_STRUCTURE_AND_SOCIAL_CHANGE_ENGLISH
P. 248

Unit 11: Theories of Social Change


          production that human beings can increase their numbers; this growth then leads to new problems,  Notes
          which are solved by succeeding innovation.
          Mechanisms of curvilinear and cyclic change: saturation and exhaustion
          Models of one-directional change assume that change in a certain direction induces further change in
          the same direction; models of curvilinear or cyclic change, on the other hand, assume that change in
          a certain direction creates the conditions for change in another (perhaps even the opposite) direction.
          More specifically, it is often assumed that growth has its limits and that in approaching these limits
          the change curve will inevitably be bent. Ecological conditions such as the availability of natural
          resources, for instance, can limit population, economic, and organizational growth.
          Shorter-term cyclic changes are explained by comparable mechanisms. Some theories of the business
          cycle, for example, assume that the economy is saturated periodically with capital goods; investments
          become less necessary and less profitable, the rate of investments diminishes, and this downward
          trend results in a recession. After a period of time, however, essential capital goods will have to be
          replaced; investments are pushed up again, and a phase of economic expansion begins.
          Cyclical theories of social change focus on the rise and fall of civilisations attempting to discover and
          account for these patterns of growth and decay” – (Ian Robertson). Spengler, Toynbee and Sorokin
          can be regarded as the Champions of this theory. Their ideas may be briefed here.
          1. Spengler: ‘The Destiny of Civilisations’
             Oswald Spengler, a German school teacher, in his book “The Decline of the West”-1918, pointed
             out that the fate of civilisations was a matter of “destiny”. Each civilisation is like a biological
             organism and has a similar life-cycle; birth, maturity old age and death.
             After making a study of eight major civilisations, including the West, he said that the modern
             Western Society is in the last stage, i.e. old age. He concluded that the Western Societies were
             entering a period of decay – as evidenced by wars, conflicts, and social breakdown that heralded
             their doom.
             This theory is almost out of fashion today. His idea of ’destiny’ is hardly an adequate explanation
             of social change. His biological analogy is also too unrealistic and his work is too mystical and
             speculative.
          2. Toynbee: ‘Challenge and Response’
             Arnold Toynbee, a British historian with enough sociological insight has offered a somewhat
             more promising a theory of social change. His famous book “A Study of History”-1946, a
             multivolume work, draws on materials from 24 civilisations.
             The key—concepts in Toynbee’s theory are those of “challenge and response”. “Every society
             faces challenges-at first, challenges posed by the environment; later challenges from internal and
             external enemies.
             The nature of the responses determines the society’s fate. The achievements of a civilisation consist
             of its successful responses to challenges; if it cannot mount an effective response, it dies”.-(Ian
             Robertson).
             Toynbee’s views are more optimistic than those of Spengler’s, for he does not believe that all
             civilisations will inevitably decay. He has pointed out that history is a series of cycles of decay and
             growth. But each new civilisation is able to learn from the mistakes and tomorrow from cultures
             of others.
             It is, therefore, possible for each new cycle to offer higher levels of achievement. Still he has not
             explained why some societies are able to offer effective responses to their challenges while others
             do not, or why a society should overcome one challenge but become a victim of another.
          3. Sorokin: ‘Sensate’ and ‘Ideational’ Culture:
             The Russian-American sociologist, Pitirim A Sorokin, in his book “Social and Culture Dynamics”-
             1938, has offered another explanation of social change. His work has had a more lasting impact
             on sociological thinking. Instead of viewing civilisations into terms of development and decline


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       243
   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253