Page 115 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 115

Social  Stratification


                   Notes              Referring to the authority enjoyed by these caste councils, Kapadia (Sociological Bulletin,
                                      September, 1962 : 74) has referred to certain examples pertaining to three periods-1962, 1912
                                      and 1861. Pointing to the period 1861, he gives two examples of a civil judge of Maharashtra
                                      who had married a widow, and the couple was so much humiliated by their caste council
                                      that they had to commit suicide; another of a person who was ex-communicated by his caste
                                      council for going to London and was readmitted on paying a fine of Rs.1,500. Referring to a
                                      period fifty years later, that is, in 1912, Kapadia refers to one Raman Bhai who was ex-
                                      communicated from his caste for taking food with low caste people; and one Jaisukhlal
                                      Mehta who too was ex-communicated for marrying his widowed sister. Referring to the year
                                      1962, Kapadia maintains that when caste council is legally deprived of its authority to enforce
                                      its traditional norms upon its members by ex-communication, it continues to regulate the
                                      conduct and minds of its members. In 1993, in villages the caste councils may hold some
                                      power but in the urban areas, they are no longer powerful.

                                  6.3 Caste System as a System of Stratification

                                  Societies are divided into hierarchical groups in a way that though various groups are considered
                                  inequal in relation to each other but within one group, members are viewed as equals. Two main
                                  criteria of social stratification are caste and class, but some other recognised units of stratification
                                  are age, gender and race/ethnicity too. Social stratification is different from social differentiation.
                                  The term ‘differentiation’ has broader application as it makes individuals and groups separate
                                  and distinct from each other for purposes of comparison. For example, within class strata, income,
                                  occupation, and education provide basis for differentiation and comparison. Stratification occurs
                                  where differences are ranked hierarchically.
                                  Caste as a Unit and a System
                                  In India, both caste and class are used as basis of hierarchical ranking and exist side by side.
                                  However, caste, which is rooted in religious belief, is considered a more important basis of social
                                  stratification for social, economic, and religious purposes. ‘Caste’ is a hereditary social group
                                  which does not permit social mobility to its members. It involves ranking according to birth which
                                  affects one’s occupation, marriage, and social relationships.
                                  Caste is used both as a unit and as a system. As a unit, caste is defined as ‘a closed-rank status
                                  group’, i.e., a group in which the status of members, their occupations, the field of mate-selection,
                                  and interaction with others is fixed. As a system, it refers to collectivity of restrictions, namely,
                                  restrictions on change of membership, occupation, marriage, and commensal and social relations.
                                  In this context, there is a presupposition that no caste can exist in isolation and that each caste is
                                  closely involved with other castes in the network of economic, political, and ritual relationships.
                                  The ‘closed-rank group’ feature of caste also explains its structure.
                                  Caste : Structural and Cultural Concepts

                                  Caste is looked upon as a structural as well as a cultural phenomenon. As a structural phenomenon,
                                  it refers to interrelated statuses, patterned interaction among castes on the basis of different
                                  restrictions, and a stable set of social relations. As a cultural phenomenon, it is viewed as ‘a set of
                                  values, beliefs and practices’. Most scholars have viewed caste as a solidarity and not as a set of
                                  values and attitudes. The structure of the caste system is such that it has an organised pattern of
                                  interrelated rights and obligations of members of each caste and individual castes as groups, in
                                  terms of statuses, roles and social norms.
                                  In structural terms, Bougle (1958:9) has explained castes as “hereditarily specialised and
                                  hierarchically arranged groups”, while as a system, he has referred to its three characteristics :
                                  hierarchy, hereditary specialisation, and repulsion. Explaining the last characteristic, he claims




         110                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120