Page 269 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 269

Social  Stratification


                   Notes          such restrictions relating to caste endogamy and clan exogamy. Members of a caste are required
                                  to marry within their caste/sub-caste, and outside their own clan and that of mother, grandmother
                                  and maternal grandmother, etc. Thus, stratification by “status groups” evolves on the basis of
                                  agreed upon communal action and conventional styles of life.
                                  Weber states that with some over-simplification, one might say that “classes” are stratified according
                                  to their relations to the production and acquisition of goods, whereas “status groups” are stratified
                                  according to the principles of their consumption of goods as represented by special “styles of life”.
                                  An “occupational group” is also a status group. Generally, it successfully claims social honour
                                  only by virtue of the special style of life which may be determined by it. The differences between
                                  classes and status groups frequently overlap. Castes in India are a sort of status communities.
                                  Brahmins, for example, have shown, in the past, a relatively high degree of indifference to pecuniary
                                  income, and they have been at the top of caste hierarchy. Stratification by status is favoured when
                                  the bases of the acquisition and distribution of goods are relatively stable, and not threatened by
                                  onslaught of technology and economic transformation.
                                  Guarantees of Status Stratification
                                  As we have stated earlier that specific  style of life  is the characteristic feature of a given status
                                  group. Such a style of life is ensured by the status group through observance of certain norms and
                                  regulations vis-a-vis its members. Social honour is estimated based on adherence to the normative
                                  compliance by individual members or collectively by all the members as a status group. Visits to
                                  specific streets, neighbourhoods, groups, etc., are also examples of encircling of status groups. The
                                  development of status is essentially a question of stratification resting upon usurpation. Such
                                  usurpation is the normal origin of almost all status honour. Stability of a system of stratification
                                  comes in from legally sanctioned social order.
                                  “Ethnic” Segregation and “Caste”
                                  Weber considers “castes” as examples of status groups. When the status group evolves into a
                                  closed “caste”, it realizes its aims to the fullest extent. Status distinctions are then guaranteed not
                                  merely by conventions and laws, but also by rituals. Ritualistic impurity and stigma or relative
                                  purity and honour characterize caste hierarchy or status honour based on the principle of pure
                                  and impure. According to Weber, the “caste” is the normal form in which ethnic communities
                                  usually live side by side in a “societalized” manner. Caste-like status distinctions are found all
                                  over the world.
                                  However, a “status” segregation grown into a “caste’ differs in its structure from a mere “ethnic”
                                  segregation. Caste is a vertical social system of super - and subordination relations between
                                  different caste groups. An ethnic group has its own honour as the highest one. “Caste” insists on
                                  a hierarchy of honour, and more so in favour of the privileged or upper castes and status groups.
                                  By implication, there are actually the negatively privileged status groups, characterized by repulsion
                                  and segregation and denial to access societal resources.
                                  Finally, the development of status groups from ethnic groups (including castes) is by no means
                                  the normal phenomenon. The “objective” racial differences are not basic to every subjective
                                  sentiment of an ethnic community. A status group is to a high degree effective in producing
                                  extreme types. At the same time, quite frequently, the class situation is by far the predominant
                                  factor in the possibility of a style of life expected for members of a status group.
                                  Status Privileges
                                  For all practical purposes, stratification by status goes hand in hand with a monopolization of
                                  ideal and material goods or opportunities, in a typical manner. Besides the specific status honour
                                  based on distance and exclusiveness, we also find all sorts of material monopolies. Such honorific
                                  preferences may include the privilege of wearing special costumes, of eating special dishes, taboo




         264                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274