Page 286 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 286

Unit 13: Changing Dimensions of Social Stratification


            2. The shift in the mode of production in agriculture from family-based subsistence farming to  Notes
              market-oriented hired worker-based agriculture.
            3. The increasing diversification of economic and social life in the village.
            These are new parameters of status and social mobility in the countryside replacing the traditional
            criteria related to sanskritization, westernization and the dominant caste.
            It is also reported that based on the production-exchange relations rural society can be divided
            into: (a) semi-proletariat, (b) small holders, (c) farmers, and (d) rentiers. In most studies today the
            concepts of class and mode of production are used to explain agrarian stratification and its
            transformation. However, some hardcore Marxists believe that there are only two classes :
            (a) class of big landowners (including rich peasants); and (b) class of agricultural labourers
            (including landless labourers). It is undeniable that the middle peasants as a class category have
            acquired considerable significance. Class-based power relations and dominant castes too influence
            rural stratification system. Rural class structure and class relations can also be seen in terms of
            production, indebtedness and asset structure. As such, there are : (a) big, (b) medium, (c) petty, (d)
            landless peasants, and (e) landlords. Distribution of assets corroborates class stratification.
            Stratification of peasants is understood mainly in terms of the mode of production in agriculture.
            Based on the landholding and resources, the agrarian hierarchy comprises : (a) landless agricultural
            labourers, (b) small peasants, (c) middle peasants, (d) rich peasants, and (e) landlords (mainly
            absentee). Thus, both landholdings and resources are considered as the main criteria for using
            attributes and interaction in the understanding of agrarian hierarchy. In agrarian stratification,
            there are old issues and new explanation and new issues and old explanation.  Leader-landlord
            nexus is also seen because the local leaders are landlords as well. The leaders are also employers
            of labour, and they come from a high social stratum, because the beneficiaries of the land reforms
            are mainly rich peasants. The historicity of a given region/sub-region and effective implementation
            of land reforms also determine the nature of agrarian hierarchy.
            Analytically speaking, in contrast to the rural society, the urban society is divided into : (a)
            industrial bourgeoisie, (b) the middle class or petty bourgeoisie, further divided into upper, middle
            and lower middle classes, (c) the industrial proletariat, (d) semi-proletariat, and (e) lumpen
            proletariat. Thus, rural and urban phenomena are two distinct patterns of life. Country-town
            nexus has always been there, and therefore, despite distinctions between rural and urban settings,
            the rich and the poor are basically similar in both. Caste, class and power are common to the two
            settings. However, the two differ in terms of the contexts and extents of operation of a particular
            principle or a set of criteria/attributes. The structural and cultural differences make the two
            different phenomena.
            Urban industrial social stratification is characterized by the professional and the working classes
            to a large extent. Professional classes reflect social and cultural differentiation or changes from
            tradition to modernity in the fields of occupation, industry and economy. Emergence of professional
            classes becomes a measure of social mobility. Urban industrial social stratification consists of the
            following classes :
            (a)  Upper class
            (b)  Upper-middle class
            (c)  Lower-middle class
            (d)  Working class
            These classes are generally framed on the basis of income and occupation. Conceptually, an
            industrial society can be characterized, based on income and occupation, having a very open view
            of status, role and power allocation. Open relationships, competition, radicalism, innovation and
            utilitarianism-rationalism are the main features of an industrial society. Urban industrial




                                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    281
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291