Page 71 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 71

Social  Stratification


                   Notes              obscured the class boundaries. In the Theories of Surplus Value, Marx refers explicitly to the
                                      growth of the middle class as a phenomenon of the development of capitalism. A continual
                                      increase in the members of the middle classes was felt due to growth of capitalism.
                                  •   Radical political movements, including women’s movement and diverse ethnic and national
                                      movements, have not been class-based. Coalitions and alliances in social life have blurred
                                      class consciousness in terms of the Marxist theory. The place of the peasantry in the class
                                      structure and its political role in different types of society were not given due significance in
                                      the Marxist theory.
                                  •   According to Kosambi, caste and class-based stratification and exploitation existed side by
                                      side in India. Similarly, different forms of slavery and bondage, feudal relations have also
                                      existed in different combinations in the same areas and at the same time.
                                  •   Marx talked of two antagonistic classes, having “unity of opposites”, but these classes have
                                      not been undifferentiated. Several groups exist in between the two classes. Today, civil
                                      society and voluntary groups have impinged upon the state to change its character and
                                      functioning.
                                  •   In India, in spite of globalization and privatization, the state remains the largest employer
                                      today. In view of the recent recession in the world economy, particularly in America,
                                      professionals are again looking for government jobs for reasons of security and guaranteed
                                      pay package, And even, then the organized workforce is about one-fifth of the total earners.
                                      In such a situation division of society in terms of bourgeoisie and proletariat and implicit
                                      class conflict between the two seem to be a presumptuous phenomenon.
                                  •   In his doctoral thesis A Contribution to the History of Medieval Business Organizations (1889),
                                      Weber studied the cost, risk or profit of an enterprise. After this, he started training at the
                                      German bench/or bar. At this point of time, he got acquainted with the social and political
                                      problems of agrarian society. He joined as an instructor in law at the University of Berlin.
                                      Weber also studied social, political and economic developments of Roman society.
                                  •   Since Weber was born after Marx, he had advantage of reacting to the Marxist ideas and
                                      conceptualizations. He tried to “round out” Marx’s economic materialism by a political and
                                      military materialism. “Weber looks for the disposition over wapons and over means of
                                      administration.” He makes a clear and rational distinction between economic, social and
                                      political orders of society, and considers power as a key to all the domains of society.
                                  •   Weber writes : “In general, we understand by ‘power’ the chance of a man or of a number of
                                      men to realize their own will in a communal action even against the resistance of others, who
                                      are participating in action.”
                                  •   “Economically conditioned” power is not, of course, identical with “power” as such. On the
                                      contrary, the emergence of economic power may be the consequence of power existing on
                                      other grounds. Man does not strive for power only in order to enrich himself economically.
                                      Power, including economic power, may be valued “for its own sake”.
                                  •   “Social order” is defined by the way in which social honour is distributed in a society. The
                                      social order and the economic, order are related to the legal order. However, the two are not
                                      identical. The way in which economic goods and services are distributed and used determines
                                      the economic order.
                                  •   The social order is determined by the economic order to a high degree and in turn reacts
                                      upon it. Thus, “classes”, “status groups” and “parties” are phenomena of the distribution of
                                      power within a community.
                                  •   “The term ‘class’ refers to any group of people that is found in the same class situation”.
                                      Competition eliminates some and patronizes others. Monopoly occurs either due to absence
                                      or weak competition or when the rival is ousted from competition.
                                  •   “Property” and “lack of property” are, therefore, the basic categories of all class situations.



         66                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76