Page 77 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 77

Social  Stratification


                   Notes          obscure. They probably lie in the twin bases of ethnicity and occupational specialization. The
                                  system which the Brahmins perfected was founded on five main divisions, four caste groups
                                  (Varna) and an out caste group (Pancham Varna), the untouchables. The four caste groups were the
                                  Brahmis, the priestly class having religious authority, the Kshatriyas, the secular and military ruler
                                  and landlord caste, the Vaishyas the mercantile middle class and the Shudra - the servants and
                                  slaves class. The untouchables performed only the most degrading and ritually impure/polluting
                                  tasks.
                                  Caste has been described as the fundamental social institution of India. As Andre Beitelle (1996)
                                  points out, “sometimes the term is used metaphorically to refer to rigid social distinctions or
                                  extreme social exclusiveness wherever found. But it is among the Hindus in India that we find the
                                  system in it’s most fully developed form, although analogous forms exist among Muslims,
                                  Christians, Sikhs and other religious groups in South Asia”.
                                  Class
                                  Class, commonly known as social class, is one of the major forms of social stratification along with
                                  estate and caste. In the course of the first three decades of the nineteenth century the term class
                                  gradually replaced ‘estates’, ‘ranks’ and ‘orders’ as the major word used to denote divisions
                                  within society. In The Social Science Encyclopaedia, Zygmunt Bauman (1984), in a brilliant analysis,
                                  tells us that “the change of vocabulary reflected the diminishing significance of rank and ascribed
                                  or inherited qualities in general and the growing importance of possessions and income among
                                  the determinants of social position. Class now came to refer to large categories of population, (1)
                                  distinct from other categories in respect of wealth and related social position, (2) deriving their
                                  distinctive status mainly from their location in the production and distribution of social wealth,
                                  (3) sharing accordingly in distinctive interests either opposing or complimenting other group
                                  interests, and (4) consequently displaying a tendency to a group - distinctive political, cultural
                                  and social attitudes and behaviour.





                                              Class status is determined by property, achievement and capacity of an individual.


                                  In simpler terms, a class is a category or group of persons having a definite status in society which
                                  permanently determines the relation to other groups. The relative position of the class in the social
                                  scale arises from the degree of prestige attached to it.
                                  The major theoretical tradition within class analysis is derived from the works of Karl Marx and
                                  Max Weber on the newly emerging class structure of industrial capitalism in the nineteenth
                                  century. Marx analysed class in relation to the ownership of capital and the means of production.
                                  A class is formed by an aggregate of persons who play the same role in the production mechanism.
                                  Marx divided the entire human population into those who owned property or means of production
                                  and those who did not - the capitalist class and the proletariat. Marx saw classes as tangible
                                  collectivities and as real social forces with the capacity to change society. The never ending drive
                                  of capitalists to create profit led to the exploitation of proletariat and so Marx believed that it
                                  would result into it’s pauperization. In these circumstances the workers would develop class
                                  consciousness and the proletariat would grow from being a class in itself, that is an economically
                                  defined category with no self-awareness, to become a class ‘for itself’ made up of workers with a
                                  class-conscious view of the world and ready to pursue class conflict against the capitalists. Thus,
                                  Marx distinguished classes in objective terms : that is, in terms of their position in the productive
                                  system.




         72                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82