Page 361 - DECO502_INDIAN_ECONOMIC_POLICY_ENGLISH
P. 361

Unit 28: Parallel Economy



        can be brought within manageable limits so that it does not pose a threat to the very objectives of  Notes
        national economic policies. On the other hand, there is another group of economists who believe that
        mixed economy is only a euphemism for capitalist system and there is no hope of controlling black
        economy in the framework of the mixed economy that prevails in India.

        Fundamentalist View
        Since tax evasion is basic to the phenomenon of black money generation, the question arises : What
        motivates tax evasion ? Meena Gupta and Thavaraj provide an answer : “It is obvious that tax evasion
        is a disease associated with an economic system based on private property. The disease assumes
        epidemic proportions when environmental pollution affecting the social, political, administrative
        and ethical systems exceeds the limits of tolerance.”A similar view has been expressed by Dr. V.M.
        Dandekar in the following words : “If one had any notions on this point, one would have suggested
        that if large incomes do not pay taxes they should, the remedy is not to lower the tax rates but abolish
        altogether incomes above a certain limit.”
        Sunanda Sen goes a step further and calls for a change in the character of the state since mixed
        economy does not provide the requisite framework for the purpose. She writes : “The failure of the
        government’s recent drive to curb smuggling is illustrative of the self-defeating nature of controls in
        a partially planned economy... attempts to control such evasion through a manipulation of instruments
        open to the state in a mixed economy are not likely to meet with much success unless the reforms are
        extensive enough to change the character of the state itself.”
        The fundamentalist view, therefore, does not see any merit in making certain marginal adjustments
        in tax rates because this will not serve any useful purpose in controlling black money, nor does it see
        any merit in removing all controls, but it feels that if tangible results have to be achieved, the abolition
        to private property or at least fixing a ceiling on property is essential so that the motivation for
        acquiring more wealth itself is blunted.
        The Moderate View
        There are two variants of the moderate view. One is typified by Kabra who considers the
        fundamentalist view as “naive, one-dimensional view of the state in as much as it fails to recognise a
        need for partial, effective controls, without necessarily changing the character of the state in its
        essentials.” It would, therefore, be inadvisable not to initiate measures within the framework of the
        mixed economy. In support of their contention, they advance the argument that there are mixed
        capitalist economies in which the extent of black money is much smaller, which are much better
        managed and in which ethical standards in politics are much better. They, therefore, plead for internally
        consistent but extensive controls, so that they are relatively strong in comparison with the forces
        operating the parallel economy. As a consequence, the control mechanisms should make the economy
        perform much better, not only in the narrow sense of acquiring more revenue or making certain essential
        goods available, but in the broader sense of creating a social order based on equality and justice.
        Prem Shankar Jha who represents the other variant, believes that “by far the worst effect of the
        regime of controls is that it has perverted the operation of the profit motive in the economy. Instead
        of being harnessed to increasing production, it is now harnessed to the exploitation of shortage.”
        Four sets of reforms that can have a dramatic effect on the parallel economy, according to Prem
        Shankar Jha are : (i) lifting of price controls on all products except a few basic consumer goods (where
        dual pricing is in any case preferable to controls); (ii) the exemption of savings from taxation; (iii) the
        indexation of direct tax rates to the cost of living; and (iv) the liberalisation of the tax laws governing
        the depreciation allowance, to permit firms to write off capital at a rate of their own choosing. Jha,
        broadly speaking, represents the view of the private sector lobby which believes that controls are at
        the root of prevailing shortages and the operations of the free market mechanism will be able to
        usher in an era of plenty, remove shortages and thus reduce the size of black market economy.
        In the light of these two broad view-points, we discuss in the following section the concrete measures
        suggested for controlling the parallel economy in India.
        (i)  Rationalisation of tax structure : Various suggestions have been made by different groups of
             economists in this regard. Most of them are aimed at reduction of tax rates. For instance, it has


                                         LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       355
   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366