Page 106 - DENG402_HISTORY_OF_ENGLISH_LITERATURE
P. 106

Unit 13: The Eighteenth Century-Approach/Transition Towards Romanticism (Progress of Education, Philosophical ...........

            13.1  A Reaction                                                                       Notes

            The Romantic Movement was a European, not only an English, phenomenon. Its repercussions
            were felt towards the end of the eighteenth century, but its efflorescence came at different times in
            different countries and in different ways. Germany was perhaps the first country to manifest a
            marked change in its sensibility which affected its philosophical thought more than literature.
            England turned romantic about the beginning of the nineteenth century, and France, the witness to
            the famous French Revolution (1789), manifested the influence of romanticism around 1830, when
            the Romantic Movement was already starting to decline in England. Romanticism meant different
            things in different countries, and even in the same country it implied different things with different
            writers. Thus in England it is customary to herd Wordsworth, Shelley, Coleridge, Keats, and
            Byron all as romantics. But how different, say, Byron and Wordsworth are! A critic recommends
            the use of the term “romanticisms. “rather than “romanticism” in consideration of the variety of
            its fundamental features. Whatever be the interpretation of the term “romanticism,” it is clear that
            it was essentially of the nature of a reaction. In England the Romantic Movement implies a
            reaction against the school of Dryden, Pope, and Dr. Johnson. However greatly may Wordsworth
            and Byron differ in their conception and practice of poetry, it is indisputable that both of them
            reacted against the set conventions and rules of poetry formulated and traditionalised over the
            decades by the poets of the neoclassic school. The Romantic Movement was thus a revolt against
            literary tradition. But it was more; it was also a revolt against social authority. It was perhaps
            Schlegel who first defined romanticism as “liberalism in literature.” Most of the romantic poets
            were for the liberation of the individual spirit from the shackles of social authority as well as
            literary tradition. This emphasis on individual predilection, which in philosophical terms approaches
            subjectivism, renders the romantic output somewhat chaotic. When there is no tradition or uniting
            authority, it is not surprising that the romantic poets take widely divergent paths.



              Did u know?  Thus, even if we may accept that there was a classical or neoclassical school of
                          poetry, it is difficult to conceive of the existence of a romantic “school”.


            13.2 The Nature of the Revolt
            “The romantic movement” says William J. Long, “was marked, and is always marked, by a strong
            reaction and protest against .the bondage of rule and custom which in science and theology as well
            as literature, generally tend to fetter the free human spirit.” It is of interest to note that just as the
            romantics revolted against the literary traditions of the eighteenth century, Dryden and Pope
            themselves had revolted in their turn against the tradition of the previous age. The romantics
            looked for inspiration and guidance to Spenser and Milton, whereas Dryden and Pope had looked
            to the roman poets of antiquity. Thus both the neoclassicists and romantics, while breaking away
            from the traditions existing immediately before them, respected a more ancient tradition. Let us
            consider in what respects the romantics parted with the neoclassic tradition.




              Task Write a short note on the nature of the Revolt.


            13.3  Reaction Against Reason
            Cazamian observes: “The literary transition from the Renascence to the Restoration is nothing
            more or less than the progress of a spirit of liberty, at once fanciful, brilliant, and adventurous,
            towards a rule and discipline both in inspiration and in form.”The transition from neoclassicism to
            romanticism is just the reverse of this. The neoclassicists were champions of common sense and
            reason, and were in favour of normal generalities against the whims and eccentricities of individual
            genius. “Nature” and reason were glorified. Much of the satire of the eighteenth century was
                                  LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                               99
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111