Page 245 - DENG402_HISTORY_OF_ENGLISH_LITERATURE
P. 245

History of English Literature

                     Notes         tensions arising out of everyday life and to detect frustrations which might otherwise actualize
                                   themselves in opposition to the system into channels which serve the system.
                                   It is because the effects of culture are so often unconsciously absorbed, that the need for a Cultural
                                   Studies emphasising critique arises. As we pointed out earlier in this essay, the disciplines that
                                   claim selected aspects of culture as their subject restrict that subject arbitrarily--for instance, by
                                   constituting the field of literary study as a canon. Simultaneously, they have placed a wedge
                                   between professionals and the public in the service of the ruling classes as in the case of literary
                                   study where so-called, 'low' culture is excluded from the research domain. Nor should we now
                                   continue to be fooled by the admission of films, popular novels, soap operas and the like into the
                                   curricula of literature departments. As long as such cultural artifacts are examined as merely the
                                   materials that make up a fixed culture, their disciplinary descriptions will do no more than create
                                   storehouses of knowledge having almost nothing to do with lived culture, much less its
                                   transformation. Only a counter-disciplinary praxis developed by intellectuals who resist
                                   disciplinary formation is likely to produce emancipatory social practices.
                                   The problem with suggesting that Cultural Studies be counter disciplinary is that it cannot be
                                   housed in universities as they are presently structured. Hence, the need for counter-institutions.
                                   There would be various sorts of collectives, variously membered study groups, counter-disciplinary
                                   research groups, even societies and institutes.
                                   It is unlikely that the disciplinary structures and mechanisms of universities will disappear in the
                                   near future. However, it would be a mistake to locate Cultural Studies within them. Our alternative
                                   would be to treat disciplines as peripheral to our main concerns while nonetheless obtaining some
                                   important concessions from their administrators. This is a tactical matter which has to be negotiated
                                   situation by situation. However, we can go even further and develop models of collaborative
                                   inquiry that extend beyond the university in order to combat hegemonic public spheres and to
                                   form alliances with other oppositional public spheres. In the context of Cultural Studies it will not
                                   be appropriate simply to generate idiosyncratic interpretations of cultural artifacts.




                                     Did u know?  The most important aim of a counter-disciplinary praxis is radical social change.
                                   We should not be resigned to the roles that universities assign us. The resisting intellectual can
                                   develop a collective, counter-disciplinary praxis within the university that has a political impact
                                   outside it. The important tactical question at this moment in the history of North American
                                   universities is how to get Cultural Studies established as a form of cultural critique. Our suggestion
                                   has been the formation of institutes for cultural studies that can constitute an oppositional public
                                   sphere.


                                   32.3.3  Salient Features
                                   Some researchers, especially in early British cultural studies, apply a Marxist model to the field.
                                   This strain of thinking has some influence from the Frankfurt School, but especially from the
                                   structuralist Marxism of Louis Althusser and others. The main focus of an orthodox Marxist approach
                                   concentrates on the production of meaning. This model assumes a mass production of culture and
                                   identifies power as residing with those producing cultural artifacts. In a Marxist view, those who
                                   control the means of production (the economic base) essentially control a culture.
                                   Other approaches to cultural studies, such as feminist cultural studies and later American
                                   developments of the field, distance themselves from this view. They criticize the Marxist assumption
                                   of a single, dominant meaning, shared by all, for any cultural product. The non-Marxist approaches
                                   suggest that different ways of consuming cultural artifacts affect the meaning of the product. This
                                   view is best exemplified by the book Doing Cultural Studies: The Case of the Sony Walkman,
                                   which seeks to challenge the notion that those who produce commodities control the meanings
                                   that people attribute to them. Feminist cultural analyst, theorist and art historian Griselda Pollock
                                   contributed to cultural studies from viewpoints of art history and psychoanalysis. The writer Julia
            238                                          LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248