Page 54 - DENG403_BRITISH_DRAMA
P. 54

British Drama



                 Notes               Facticity is both a limitation and a condition of freedom. It is a limitation in that a large part of
                                     one’s facticity consists of things one couldn’t have chosen (birthplace, etc.), but a condition in
                                     the sense that one’s values most likely will depend on it.


                                          Example: Consider two men, one of whom has no memory of his past and the other
                                     remembers everything. They have both committed many crimes, but the first man, knowing
                                     nothing about this, leads a rather normal life while the second man, feeling trapped by his
                                     own past, continues a life of crime, blaming his own past for “trapping” him in this life. There
                                     is nothing essential about his committing crimes, but he ascribes this meaning to his past.

                                 (7)  Authenticity: The theme of authentic existence is common to many existentialist thinkers. It
                                     is often taken to mean that one has to “find oneself” and then live in accordance with this self.
                                     A common misunderstanding is that the self is something one can find if one looks hard
                                     enough, that one’s true self is substantial.
                                     What is meant by authenticity is that in acting, one should act as oneself, not as One acts or as
                                     one’s genes or any other essence require. The authentic act is one that is in accordance with
                                     one’s freedom. Of course, as a condition of freedom is facticity, this includes one’s facticity,
                                     but not to the degree that this facticity can in any way determine one’s choices. The role of
                                     facticity in relation to authenticity involves letting one’s actual values come into play when
                                     one makes a choice, so that one also takes responsibility for the act instead of choosing either-
                                     or without allowing the options to have different values.
                                 (8)  Inauthenticity: The inauthentic is the denial to live in accordance with one’s freedom. This
                                     can take many forms, from pretending choices are meaningless or random, through convincing
                                     oneself that some form of determinism is true, to a sort of “mimicry” where one acts as “One
                                     should.” How “One” should act is often determined by an image one has of how one such as
                                     oneself acts. This image usually corresponds to some sort of social norm, but this does not
                                     mean that all acting in accordance with social norms is inauthentic: The main point is the
                                     attitude one takes to one’s own freedom and responsibility, and the extent to which one acts
                                     in accordance with this freedom.

                                 (9)  Despair: Commonly defined as a loss of hope, Despair in existentialism is more specifically
                                     related to the reaction to a breakdown in one or more of the defining qualities of one’s self or
                                     identity. If a person is invested in being a particular thing, such as a bus driver or an upstanding
                                     citizen, and then finds their being-thing compromised, they would normally be found in state
                                     of despair—a hopeless state. For example, an athlete who loses his legs in an accident may
                                     despair if he has nothing else to fall back on, nothing on which to rely for his identity. He
                                     finds himself unable to be that which defined his being.
                                     What sets the existentialist notion of despair is that existentialist despair is a state one is in
                                     even when they aren’t overtly in despair. So long as a person’s identity depends on qualities
                                     that can crumble, they are considered to be in perpetual despair. And as there is, in Sartrean
                                     terms, no human essence found in conventional reality on which to constitute the individual’s
                                     sense of identity, despair is a universal human condition. As Kierkegaard defines it in his
                                     Either/Or: “Any life-view with a condition outside it is despair.” In other words, it is possible
                                     to be in despair without despairing.
                                (10) Reason: Emphasizing action, freedom, and decision as fundamental, existentialists oppose
                                     themselves to rationalism and positivism. That is, they argue against definitions of human
                                     beings as primarily rational. Rather, existentialists look at where people find meaning.
                                     Existentialism asserts that people actually make decisions based on the meaning to them
                                     rather than rationally. The rejection of reason as the source of meaning is a common theme of





          48                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59