Page 245 - DENG405_BRITISH_POETRY
P. 245

British Poetry



                   Notes         So through the medium of satire, Pope paints a picture of 18th century English society. His satire is
                                 didactic and impersonal. It is not inflicted against any person or individual, rather against the society
                                 and that, too, owing to some moral faults. He is dissatisfied with the society around which he wants
                                 to reform. The society he pictured is the aristocratic group of 18th century fashionable English
                                 society. But thee are several allied subjects, too, on which he inflicts his satire. For example, he
                                 satirized the judged that make hasty decisions.
                                 “The hungry judges soon the sentence sign,
                                 And wretches hang that jurymen may dine”
                                 He also satirized those friends whose friendship is but lust, those politicians who do not have a
                                 deeper insight and cannot see beyond the shows and take steps just for their own interests and ends
                                 etc.
                                 To sum up, the poem is a reflection of this artificial and hollow life, painted with a humorous and
                                 delicate satire. Pope’s satire is intellectual and full of wit and epigram. Is picture of Addison as
                                 Atticus though unjust and prompted by malice, is a brilliant piece of satire.


                                 24.4.2 The Rape of the Lock as a Mock Epic Poem

                                 Pope demonstrates two quite separate influences in The Rape of the Lock: mock epic and Horation
                                 satire. But since these two are quite antipodal—at least in terms of style and conventions—we shall
                                 examine not only instances of their presence, but the manner in which they are combined.
                                 Just as history provides the most suitable material for the epic poem, Pope’s use of a contemporary
                                 history—necessarily of lesser import—is equally befitting the mock epic. Accordingly, rather than
                                 depicting kings or majestic men and their distinguished deeds, intending to provoke our admiration,
                                 with perfect irony, Pope takes for his mock epic a vain female as hero, displaying her lowly trials
                                 and provoking our scorn. Here then we find our first common element, for Horace also is concerned
                                 with contemporary issues, though he certainly chooses an entirely different form for its exposition.
                                 Indeed, When Trebatius warns him away from satire, suggesting, “. . . if such great love of writing
                                 grips you, think big;/sing about unbeaten Caesar’s deeds, and be rewarded,” which certainly smacks
                                 of contemporary epic, Horace politely declines: “I’m insufficient; we all can’t write of battle lines.”
                                 Another instance in which The Rape of the Lock makes use of epic convention and differs from
                                 Horace’s Satires, is the introductory invocation of the Muse. Though this has no parallel in the
                                 Satires, Horace does begin the first epistle, in Book I of Epistles with: “My very first Muse sang of
                                 you.” It’s inclusion, by Pope, is not only necessitated by the mock epic form, but also by the ending
                                 of the work: Belinda wins immortality by means of the poem itself—muse related—as well as by
                                 the lock rising to form a new heavenly body: “But trust the Muse—she saw it upward rise,/Tho’
                                 mark’d by none but quick Poetic Eyes,” which is essentially saying the same thing: her immortality
                                 is owing to poetry.
                                 Even Horace himself acknowledges, also in the Epistles: “It is the Muse who gives immortality.”
                                 Pope also uses the initial reference to the Muse to establish the presence of the supernatural, though
                                 instead of the classical gods providing the machinery, inciting to battle and protecting the mortal
                                 hero—as would be the case in epic convention—we find the Sylphs of Rosicrucian Philosophy. The
                                 Sylphs, of course, proved a perfect choice, for not only do the lack the reverence of classical gods,
                                 thus proving more suitable protectorates of our unworthy hero, but they also brought with them a
                                 literary connection with erotica, particularly in Le Comte de Gabalis.
                                 The foulness of language, in Book I Satire 2 is in no way indicative of Horace’s other satires, but it
                                 does, nevertheless, demonstrate by exaggeration—just as Book II teaches by exaggeration—that the
                                 language of Horace is the language of the street: “. . . my things are more like conversation,” as well
                                 as “ . . . talk is all it is.” This is Horace himself speaking, in Book I, of his own work. In the final Satire
                                 of that book, written at a later date, this idea had been slightly modified:





            238                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250