Page 166 - DENG501_LITERARY_CRITICISM_AND_THEORIES
P. 166

Literary Criticism and Theories



                  Notes          The signifying game between metonymy and metaphor, up to and including the active edge that
                                 splits my desire between a refusal of the signifier and a lack of being, and links my fate to the
                                 question of my destiny, this game, in all its inexorable subtlety, is played until the match is called,
                                 there where I am not, because I cannot situate myself there.  That is to say, what is needed is more
                                 than these words with which, for a brief moment I disconcerted my audience: I think where I am
                                 not, therefore I am where I do not think. Words that render sensible to an ear properly attuned
                                 with what elusive ambiguity the ring of meaning flees from our grasp along the verbal thread.
                                 What one ought to say is: I am not wherever I am the plaything of my thought, I think of what I
                                 am where I do not think to think.  This two-sided mystery is linked to the fact that the truth can
                                 be evoked only in that dimension of alibi in which all "realism" in creative works takes its virtue
                                 from metonymy; it is likewise linked to this other fact that we acceded to meaning only through
                                 the double twist of metaphor when we have the one and only key: the S and the s of Saussurian
                                 algorithm are not only the same level, and man only deludes himself when he believes his true
                                 place is at their axis, which is nowhere.  Was nowhere, that is, until Freud discovered it; for if what
                                 Freud discovered isn't that, it isn't anything.
                                 The contents of the unconscious with all their disappointing ambiguities give us no reality in the
                                 subject more consistent than the immediate; their virtue derives from the truth and in the dimension
                                 of being: Kern unseres Wesen are Freud's own terms.
                                 The double-triggered mechanism of metaphor is the very mechanism by which the symptom, in
                                 the analytic sense, is determined. Between the enigmatic signifier of the sexual trauma and the
                                 term that is substituted for it in an actual signifying chain there passes the spark that fixes in a
                                 symptom the signification inaccessible to the conscious subject in which that symptom may be
                                 resolved - a symptom being a metaphor in which flesh or function is taken as a signifying element.





                                          What do you mean by S/s?

                                 And the enigmas that desire seems to pose for a "natural philosophy," its frenzy mocking the
                                 abyss of the infinite, the secret collusion with which it envelops the pleasure of knowing and of
                                 dominating with jouissance sexual pleasure, these amount to no other derangement of instinct
                                 than that of being caught in the rails - eternally stretching forth towards the desire for something
                                 else - metonymy. Hence its "perverse" fixation at the very suspension-point of the signifying chain
                                 where the memory-screen is immobilized and the fascinating image of the fetish is petrified.
                                 There is no other way of conceiving the indestructibility of unconscious desire - in the absence of
                                 a need which, when forbidden satisfaction, does not sicken and die, even if it means the destruction
                                 of the organism itself. It is in a memory, comparable to what is called by that name in our modern
                                 thinking-machines (which are in turn based on an electronic realization of the composition of
                                 signification), it is in this sort of memory that is found the chain that insists on reproducing itself
                                 in the transference, and which is the chain of dead desire.
                                 It is the truth of what this desire has been in his history that the patient cries out through his
                                 symptom, as Christ said that the stones themselves would have cried out if the children of Israel
                                 had not lent them their voice. …
                                 Thus, to speak of the precise point we are treating in my seminars on Freud, little Hans, left in the
                                 lurch at the age of five by his symbolic environment, and suddenly forced to face the enigma of his
                                 sex and his existence, developed, under the direction of Freud and of his father, Freud's disciple,
                                 in the mythic form, around the signifying crystal of his phobia, all the permutations possible on a
                                 limited number of signifiers.
                                 The operation shows that even on the individual level the solution of the impossible is brought
                                 within man's reach by the exhaustion of all possible forms of the impossibilities encountered in
                                 solution by recourse to the signifying equation. It is a striking demonstration that illuminates the



        160                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171