Page 226 - DENG501_LITERARY_CRITICISM_AND_THEORIES
P. 226

Literary Criticism and Theories



                  Notes              these texts describe an ideal childhood-childhood as it ought to be-and perceiving a gulf
                                     between this ideal childhood and the real behavior of children we know, we work in literature
                                     and life to make children more like the ideal-to restore to them a "childhood" they appear to
                                     have lost sight of.
                                     But did we really experience childhood as we claim to remember it' Or have we come to
                                     believe we did because we ourselves in both our childhood and our adult lives have also read
                                     books by and had interactions with adults who worked to impose their visions of childhood
                                     upon us? Perhaps what we call "childhood" is always an imaginative construct of the adult
                                     mind, always being moved not only outwards to blind us to our actual perceptions of
                                     contemporary children but also backwards into the past, to blind us to our memories of our
                                     actual past experiences. Perhaps there never was a childhood as innocent, as creative, as
                                     spontaneous as adults like to imagine. Perhaps children are always more like adults than
                                     adults are ever able to see.
                                 15. Circularity
                                     Children oppressed by adult versions of childhood turn into the adults who oppress other
                                     children. Said suggests a similar circularity in the thought of Europeans about Orientals.
                                     Since the ancient Orient invented by European scholars is assumed to be the past of Europe as
                                     well as of the contemporary Orient, Europeans could assume that they were the true inheritors
                                     of that imaginary Oriental past. For instance, European linguists posited an ancient Indo-
                                     European of their own invention that evolved into both contemporary Eastern and European
                                     languages, then claimed that their own European languages were the natural evolution of
                                     Indo-European, the Eastern ones merely degenerate versions of it. This conviction of their
                                     own connection to ancient purity not only allowed Europeans to point out the degenerate
                                     nature of the modern Orient but also to work to replace it with the truly classical values they
                                     themselves represented an evolved version of. Similarly, we adults posit our own imagined
                                     childhood as what we must work to persuade contemporary children of.
                                     But in actual faa, Orientals do not turn into Europeans who then oppress a new generation of
                                     Oriental. What distinguishes our thinking about childhood from other discourses about
                                     otherness is that in this case, the other does quite literally turn into ourselves. All those who
                                     survive childhood become adults, adults who tend to think of children as their other. Even
                                     those adults who happen to be feminists tend to talk and think of children of both sexes in
                                     terms of metaphors redolent of traditional assumptions about feminine weakness and passivity;
                                     and those members of oppressed minorities who are most adamant about their own need for
                                     freedom from oppression are often among those who are most vociferous about controlling
                                     the image of the world presented in children's literature, trying to ensure that children adopt
                                     their own correct attitudes. The irony in that is as obvious as it is depressing: if our thinking
                                     about children is an aa of colonization, then it is in fact ourselves we are colonizing, ourselves
                                     we are oppressing-albeit at one remove.
                                 16. Fixity vs. Process
                                     Said suggests two contradictory modes by which Europeans address Orientals. One is the
                                     evolutionary enterprise of educating them into being more like Europeans; the other is the
                                     self-confirming enterprise  of educating them into being what Europeans have always imagined
                                     Orientals to be-typical representatives of "the Oriental mind." The same contradiction is so
                                     central to discourse about children and in children's literature that it might well be their
                                     defining characteristic.
                                 On the one hand, we believe that good children's books accurately describe what is often identified
                                 as the wonder or spontaneity or creativity of childhood. In other words, they are good because
                                 they teach children how to be childlike by providing them with appropriate images of childhood.
                                 On the other hand, however, their themes or messages are almost always about becoming less


        220                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231