Page 25 - DENG501_LITERARY_CRITICISM_AND_THEORIES
P. 25

Unit 2: Aristotle: The Poetics: Introduction, Tragedy



        rules, but only making a statement of general practice. He is fully aware of the fact that in the  Notes
        beginning the tragedy, like the epic, had no fixed limit of time.
        In the end, Aristotle asserts the superiority of the epic over the tragedy. All the elements of an epic
        are found in tragedy, but all the elements of tragedy are not found in the epic. Thus ‘spectacle’ and
        ‘melody’ are parts of tragedy, but they are not the parts of epic.
        Ch VI: Definition of Tragedy; Its Formative Parts
        This chapter is the core of the Poetics. In his famous definition of tragedy, Aristotle summarises
        what has been said already and devotes almost all the following chapters to explaining it further.
        Having shown that the arts differ from one another in the objects ‘imitated’, in the medium
        employed, and in the mode or manner of imitation. Aristotle now shows
        1. that the ‘object imitated’ by tragedy is an action or piece of life of serious interest, complete in
           itself and having magnitude, i.e. long enough to direct the change in the fortunes of the tragic
           hero and serious enough to be more than trivial;
        2. that the medium employed is language embellished by all the available decorations, such as
           melody and poetic diction; and
        3. that the manner of imitation is dramatic, i.e. the story is told not by narration but by essential
           characters acting it out. This representation excites in the auditors pity and fear, and by providing
           an outlet for these and similar emotions produces a sense of pleasurable relief (catharsis).
        It should be noted that Plato, who was more emotional than Aristotle, held that the effect of art on
        human nature might be a dangerous excitement of emotions which ought, in the interest of public
        morality, to be discouraged. Aristotle, realizing the risks of inhibition or repression replies that
        this effect is not only pleasurable but also beneficial. Tragedy is a sort of nervous specific which
        provides a ‘catharsis’ we might say, ‘a good clearance’ of emotions which might otherwise break
        out inconveniently. It saves us from psychical distress by providing an emotional outlet.
        A passage in Plato may help to explain this view: ‘When babies are restless, you don’t prescribe
        quiet for them; you sing to them and rock them to and fro.’ In such cases, the external agitation,
        getting the better of the internal agitation, produces peace and calm. The babies go to sleep. That
        agrees with Aristotle’s view. The excitement of tragedy provides for our feeling a pleasurable
        relief. A ‘good cry’ acts as an emotional aperient (or purgative). We feel all the better for it and
        leave the theatre, ‘in peace of mind, all passion spent’.
        Tragedy is next analysed into six formative parts. Of these, three are concerned with the objects
        imitated,
        1. a plot, or piece of life (human actions or experiences);
        2. the characters of the dramatis personae;
        3. the Thoughts which they express (intellectual qualities). Two of the elements, ‘diction’ and ‘melody’
           or song, are the means of imitation employed. The sixth ‘spectacle’, is the mode of imitation by
           which the story is presented on a stage before an audience.
        Of these constituent parts Aristotle regards the Plot as by far the most important—’the life and
        soul tragedy’. No amount of psychological ingenuity in drawing character, no degree of poetic or
        theatrical brilliance, can make a successful tragedy, because tragedy is in essence a story. In the
        same way, you can have no picture without some sort of shape or design. Through the whole of
        the Poetics runs this insistence on the primary importance of plot, which is the main subject of
        discussion—with one brief digression—up to the end of Chapter XVIII.
        Many of the terms used by Aristotle in this chapter have been the subject of hot controversy
        among critics. For example, words like ‘’serious’, ‘magnitude’, ‘Katharsis’, etc., have been differently
        interpreted by different critics. Similarly, his view of the comparative significance of ‘Plots’ and
        ‘character’ has also excited much discussion.
        It should also be noted that ‘thought’, in the sense of the Greek word which Aristotle has used for
        it, means all that is expressed by the use of words. Indeed, a knowledge  of Greek language and
        usage is unavoidable for precise understanding of the Poetics.


                                         LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                        19
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30