Page 279 - DENG501_LITERARY_CRITICISM_AND_THEORIES
P. 279

Unit 24: Features of Feminist Criticism



        retrieving genres in which women have excelled (diary-writing, the short story) and by publishing  Notes
        women’s writing (the Virago Press in the U.K, the Feminist Press in the U.S and Kali for Women
        in India, to name a few) feminist theories create a space for women writers.

        24.3 Grey Areas in Feminist Theories

        24.3.1 While Practising
        There are certain areas which are problematic or grey areas in feminist theories. Ought these
        theories to be applied across all cultures ? After all women as a class account for at least fifty
        percent of all cultures and there is an irreducible minimum of women’s experience common to all
        times and places. At the same time is it not culturally unacceptable to market theory constructed
        by the Western academy as if it is equally valid across the Indian subcontinent as if theory were
        another multinational product ? Look at the following remark : ‘How then, can one learn from and
        speak to the millions of illiterate rural and urban women who live “in the pores of capitalism
        inaccessible to the capitalist dynamics that allow us our shared channels of communication, the
        definition of common enemies?
        Gayatri Chakravarti Spivak, who made this comment has been herself described as a ‘Marxist
        feminist American academic, trained in literary deconstruction, [who] was born in India, and thus
        writes at the intersection of cultural and intellectual tensions’ (Morris 166). In other words the
        experience of women is not wholly the same across all cultures. Some cultures are capitalistic or
        free-enterprise cultures which provide the illusion at least of choice. Others are state controlled.
        Literacy levels vary both within and across cultures. Feminist theorists approach the discipline
        from a variety of other theoretical backgrounds [of which more will be said in 23.3.2] All these
        points suggest that no easy essentialism should enter feminist criticism or create a totalising
        narrative that wipes out cultural difference or even set up the experience of the Western academy
        as normative. At the same time this problem should not inhibit theorists or cause theory to retreat.
        For to do this Would mean that the very conspiracy of silence patriarchy creates around genres,
        movements or cultures that are women-centred will be continued. Feminist theories I think should
        articulate such silences. Even if it means acknowledging they cannot speak for or to a culture with
        any great authority, they should speak of it however haltingly. What do you feel ?
        24.3.2 While Theorising
        Feminist criticism — like other forms of literary theory — relates across critical boundaries as well.
        Simone de Beauvoir always claimed for instance that as a marxist she was primarily interested in
        a class-based analysis which treated women as a class among the oppressed all over the world
        rather than in the condition of women in itself. New historicists — of whose work Edward Said’s
        Orientalism is an example — have a vexed relationship with feminist theories. On the one hand a
        colleague of Said’s found it useful to build a parallel between his work and hers : ‘I realised, in
        reading his book that ...far more than Arabs internalised the western view [of their inferiority]
        women have internalised the male view of themselves’ (Showalter 26). On the other Aijaz Ahmad
        a marxist has criticised Said for limiting his focus to race while erasing class and gender as factors
        of oppression. Feminist theories then, cannot only develop an ethic of suffering. They must think,
        intervene and reshape the academy and the world.
        24.4 Possible Application

        Now turn to the poem by Kamala Das please and give it a quick read, keeping in mind the
        theoretical issues discussed in this unit. For instance take a look at the opening : ‘I don’t know
        politics but I know the names / Of those in power, and can repeat them like / Days of the week
        or names of months, beginning with / Nehru ... I think the ironic opening (along with the title)
        works on the level of an ironic disclaimer. It sets itself out as an introduction to the woman writer


                                         LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       273
   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284