Page 125 - DENG502_PROSE
P. 125

Unit 14:  Hazlitt-On Genius And Common Sense-Introduction


          Meanwhile, however, Hazlitt’s reputation in literary circles had become tarnished, apparently by  Notes
          retaliatory rumours spread by such as Wordsworth and Coleridge, whom he had continued to
          criticise openly for their personal failings in contrast to their earlier actual or potential
          accomplishments. And the worst was yet to come.
          But Hazlitt soon found a new source of satisfaction, along with escape from his financial woes, in
          a return to the lecture hall. In early 1818 he delivered a series of talks on “the English Poets”, from
          Chaucer to his own time. His presentation was uneven in quality, but ultimately the lectures were
          judged a success. In making the arrangements for the lectures, he also met Peter George Patmore,
          Secretary of the Surrey Institution, where the lectures were presented, and soon to become a friend
          and confidant of Hazlitt’s in the most troubled period of the latter’s life.
          The Surrey Institution lectures were printed in book form, followed by a collection of his drama
          criticism, A View of the English Stage, and the second edition of Characters of Shakespear’s Plays. [81]
          Hazlitt’s career as a lecturer gained some momentum, and his growing popularity allowed him to
          get a collection of his political writings published as well, Political Essays, with Sketches of Public
          Characters. Lectures on “the English Comic Writers” soon followed, and these as well were published
          in book form. After them came lectures on dramatists who were Shakespeare’s contemporaries,
          published as Lectures on the Dramatic Literature of the Age of Elizabeth. The latter did not go over so
          well as lectures, but were reviewed enthusiastically after they were published.
          More trouble was brewing, however. Hazlitt was attacked brutally in The Quarterly Review and
          Blackwood’s Magazine, both Tory publications. One  Blackwood’s article mocked him as “pimpled
          Hazlitt”, accused him of ignorance, dishonesty, and obscenity, and incorporated vague physical
          threats. Though Hazlitt was rattled by these attacks, he sought legal advice and sued. The lawsuit
          against Blackwood’s was finally settled out of court in his favour. Yet the attacks did not entirely

          cease. The  Quarterly Review issued a review of Hazlitt’s published lectures in which he was
          condemned as ignorant and his writing as unintelligible. Such partisan onslaughts brought spirited
          responses. One, unlike an earlier response to the Blackwood’s attack that never saw the light of day,
          was published, as A Letter to William Gifford, Esq. (1819; Gifford was the editor of the Quarterly).
          (Among other things, this pamphlet was notable for Hazlitt’s use of the term “ultracrepidarian”,
          which he might have coined; see Ultracrepidarianism.) In this pamphlet Hazlitt presented what
          amounted to an apologia for his life and work thus far and showed he was well able to defend
          himself. Yet Hazlitt’s attackers had done their damage. Not only was he personally shaken, he
          found it more difficult to have his works published, and once more he had to struggle for a living.

          14.3 Solitude and Infatuation

          His lecturing in particular had drawn to Hazlitt a small group of admirers. Best known today is
          the poet John Keats,but there were others, such as the diarist and chronicler Henry Crabb Robinson

          and the novelist Mary Russell Mitford. But the rumours that had been spread demonising him,

          along with the vilifications of the Tory press, not only hurt his pride but seriously obstructed his
          ability to earn a living. Income from his lectures had also proved insufficient to keep him afloat.
          His thoughts drifted to gloom and misanthropy. His mood was not improved by the fact that by
          now there was no pretence of keeping up appearances: his marriage had failed. Years earlier he
          had grown resigned to the lack of love between him and Sarah. He had been visiting prostitutes
          and displayed more idealised amorous inclinations toward a number of women whose names are
          lost to history. Now in 1819, he was unable to pay the rent on their rooms at 19 York Street and his
          family were evicted. That was the last straw for Sarah, who moved into rooms with their son and
          broke with Hazlitt for good, forcing him to find his own accommodation. He would sometimes see
          his son and even his wife, with whom he remained on speaking terms, but they were effectively
          separated.



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       119
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130