Page 32 - DENG502_PROSE
P. 32

Prose


                    Notes          In 1610 the fourth session of James’ first parliament met. Despite Bacon’s advice to him, James and
                                   the Commons found themselves at odds over royal prerogatives and the king’s embarrassing
                                   extravagance. The House was finally dissolved in February 1611. Throughout this period Bacon
                                   managed to stay in the favour of the king while retaining the confidence of the Commons.
                                   In 1613, Bacon was finally appointed attorney general, after advising the king to shuffle judicial
                                   appointments. As attorney general, Bacon successfully prosecuted Robert Carr, 1st Earl of Somerset
                                   and his wife, Frances Howard, Countess of Somerset for murder in 1616. The so-called “Prince’s
                                   Parliament” of April 1614 objected to Bacon’s presence in the seat for Cambridge and to the
                                   various royal plans which Bacon had supported. Although he was allowed to stay, parliament
                                   passed a law that forbade the attorney-general to sit in parliament. His influence over the king
                                   had evidently inspired resentment or apprehension in many of his peers. Bacon, however, continued
                                   to receive the King’s favour, which led to his appointment in March 1617 as the temporary Regent
                                   of England (for a period of a month), and in 1618 as Lord Chancellor. On 12 July 1618 the king
                                   created Bacon Baron Verulam, of Verulam, in the Peerage of England. As a new peer he then
                                   styled himself as “Francis, Lord Verulam”.
                                   Bacon continued to use his influence with the king to mediate between the throne and Parliament
                                   and in this capacity he was further elevated in the same peerage, as Viscount St Alban, on 27
                                   January 1621.
                                   Lord Chancellor and Public Disgrace
                                   Bacon’s public career ended in disgrace in 1621. After he fell into debt, a Parliamentary Committee
                                   on the administration of the law charged him with twenty-three separate counts of corruption. To
                                   the lords, who sent a committee to enquire whether a confession was really his, he replied, “My
                                   lords, it is my act, my hand, and my heart; I beseech your lordships to be merciful to a broken
                                   reed.” He was sentenced to a fine of £40,000 and committed to the Tower of London during the
                                   king’s pleasure; the imprisonment lasted only a few days and the fine was remitted by the king. [12]
                                   More seriously, parliament declared Bacon incapable of holding future office or sitting in parliament.
                                   He narrowly escaped undergoing degradation, which would have stripped him of his titles of
                                   nobility. Subsequently the disgraced viscount devoted himself to study and writing.
                                   There seems little doubt that Bacon had accepted gifts from litigants, but this was an accepted
                                   custom of the time and not necessarily evidence of deeply corrupt behaviour.  [13]  While
                                   acknowledging that his conduct had been lax, he countered that he had never allowed gifts to
                                   influence his judgement and, indeed, he had on occasion given a verdict against those who had
                                   paid him. The true reason for his acknowledgement of guilt is the subject of debate, but it may
                                   have been prompted by his sickness, or by a view that through his fame and the greatness of his
                                   office he would be spared harsh punishment. He may even have been blackmailed, with a threat
                                   to charge him with sodomy, into confession.
                                   The British jurist Basil Montagu wrote in Bacon’s defense, concerning the episode of his public
                                   disgrace:
                                        Bacon has been accused of servility, of dissimulation, of various base motives, and
                                        their filthy brood of base actions, all unworthy of his high birth, and incompatible
                                        with his great wisdom, and the estimation in which he was held by the noblest spirits
                                        of the age. It is true that there were men in his own time, and will be men in all times,
                                        who are better pleased to count spots in the sun than to rejoice in its glorious brightness.
                                        Such men have openly libelled him, like Dewes and Weldon, whose falsehoods were
                                        detected as soon as uttered, or have fastened upon certain ceremonious compliments
                                        and dedications, the fashion of his day, as a sample of his servility, passing over his
                                        noble letters to the Queen, his lofty contempt for the Lord Keeper Puckering, his open
                                        dealing with Sir Robert Cecil, and with others, who, powerful when he was nothing,



          26                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37