Page 205 - DENG503_INDIAN_WRITINGS_IN_LITERATURE
P. 205

Digvijay Pandya, Lovely Professional University    Unit 25: Girish Karnad: Nagmandla—Detailed Study of the Text



                           Unit 25: Girish Karnad: Nagmandla                                       Notes

                                 Detailed Study of the Text




            CONTENTS
            Objectives
            Introduction
            25.1 Girish Karnad Nagmandla
            25.2 Summary
            25.3 Key-Words
            25.4 Review Questions
            25.5 Further Readings


          Objectives

          After reading this Unit students will be able to:
          •   Introduce Karnad.
          •   Discuss Nagmandla.

          Introduction

          Girish Karnad has emerged as the most significant playwright of post-independence Indian
                                                              1
          literature, according to the Indian critic P. Dhanavel (2000:11).  The critic emphasizes Karnad’s
          humanism, derived mainly from his profound concern for the “oppressed” and the “downtrodden”,
          his compulsive return to and reinterpretation of the mythical past and oral tradition, and his
          “determined demystification of the dominant beliefs and practices”.

          25.1 Girish Karnad: Nagmandla

          Girish Karnad’s play Nâgmandla is consciously anchored in the ancient theory and tradition of
          Indian theatre. The play thus reflects Karnad’s respect for technical elements of theatrical art and
          also for the Indian tradition of storytelling, even though he innovates and experiments by sharing
          twentieth century views. In Nâgmandla, the author brings his drama into line with the changes
          occurring in Indian society and mentality. The article analyzes his technique of using different
          narrative levels and shows how in Nâgmandla the superimposed stories lead to an exemplification
          of his vision of theatre as a unifying, total experience. It is shown how the overall structure of the
          interrelated stories and plots, the triangular relationships, and the triple ending can be visualized
          graphically as a Mandala. The article ends by focusing on and discussing the three endings of the
          play, which have been the cause of surprise and controversy. It concludes that, though the last
          ending is not within the orthodoxy of Indian epic texts, the play must be studied and interpreted
          not only by keeping elements of Hindu philosophy as points of reference, but also by taking into
          account the cultural context of the Indian woman of today who seeks to fulfil her needs and
          aspirations.
          Other Indian critics, in their analysis of contemporary Indian  theatre, focus on its ambivalent
          relationship both to its classical and colonial past, and to the contemporary problems of Indian

          1 Girish Karnad was born in Matheran, near Bombay, in 1938 and grew up in Sirsi (Karnataka). He writes his
            plays in Kannada and he himself translates them into English.


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       199
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210