Page 208 - DENG504_LINGUISTICS
P. 208

Linguistics



                  Notes          itself and how to teach it, so this, in turn, helps educators tackle with English language education
                                 problems such as the teaching of vocabulary, reading and writing.
                                 Teacher's role is very important in this respect. As well as being a good source of knowledge for the
                                 learners, s/he should also act like a psychologist so as to determine proper applications in accordance
                                 with learners' mood, perceptions, backgrounds, etc. Namely, s/he should be a professional need
                                 analyst.
                                 According to EL, ELT practitioners are required to create an autonomous, interactive and meaningful
                                 language learning environment for the learners while making necessary decisions in accordance
                                 with the school and the state policies because classroom applications are thought together with its
                                 hierarchical structure in EL. Similarly, learners are regarded as the center of all classroom practices
                                 and thus educational objectives of the school and the state.
                                 All materials are presented in a meaningful way which enables learners to see the whole picture first
                                 and then getting the necessary knowledge through this holistic structure, not in isolation. Similarly,
                                 that is why educational linguists reject segmental phonology, but creat educational phonology to be
                                 used in language education.
                                 15.12 Educational Linguistics and Language Teacher Education

                                 The recent recommendation by Fillmore and Snow that all teachers need to know quite a bit about
                                 language has revived old debates about the role of linguistics in educating teacher trainees.
                                 At the beginning of the 20th century, the predominant assumption was that teachers were born and
                                 not made, or if they were made, they were "self-made." Therefore little attention was paid to the idea
                                 of foreign language teacher education. By the 1920s, however, articles began to appear that outlined
                                 curricula for the training of high school language teachers. One of the problems confronting teacher
                                 education programs in the early years of the century was lack of speaking ability on the part of
                                 candidates for certification. Teacher exams were proposed over the years to ensure a reasonable level
                                 of proficiency. They were required to pursue general methods and testing courses as well as courses
                                 in the psychology of learning. As a consequence, teachers were no longer producers, but were
                                 consumers of knowledge related to language learning and teaching.
                                 By the 1960s, teachers were expected to demonstrate both subject matter and professional competence.
                                 They were required to take courses that focused on the language itself. When linguistics courses
                                 were taught, for example, linguists in general had serious problems making linguistics relevant to
                                 teaching. Especially interesting is that in a 1964 special issue of the Modern Language Journal, a set
                                 of "guidelines" for teacher preparation was published. Despite the field's best efforts, one problem
                                 continued to nag the profession -the low level of language proficiency among future teachers. This
                                 was due to the fact that although teachers were knowledgeable about language itself, they were not
                                 taught how to present that knowledge in communicative ways.
                                 This great lack in language teacher education became booming in mid 1970s and drew special attention
                                 of educational linguists. Then they have proposed that language teachers are not -and should not be-
                                 pure linguists, thus they should learn linguistics as it is required by language education. Furthermore,
                                 EL also emphasizes that as well as language learners, teacher trainees also should be educated in a
                                 holistic and humanistic way which will enable them to teach foreign languages in the same manner,
                                 and all practices in teacher education process should aim at revealing trainees full potential in
                                 communicative competence.
                                 Educational Linguistics’ Contributions to FLL/FLT

                                 While educational linguistics contributes distinctive disciplinary focus, concepts, methods and history,
                                 it also takes distinctive form in each of the following types of curriculum and comes up with novel
                                 perspectives in curriculum planning.
                                 •    Skills: An economistic-vocationally oriented curriculum: In this kind of curricula, teaching
                                      aims to facilitate the acquisition of skills which are seen to be discrete or separately specific,


        202                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213