Page 295 - DENG504_LINGUISTICS
P. 295

Digvijay Pandya, LPU                    Unit 22: Morphological Analysis (Identification of Morphemes and Allomorph)



                Unit 22: Morphological Analysis (Identification of                                Notes
                              Morphemes and Allomorph)



          CONTENTS
          Objectives
          Introduction
          22.1 The Atoms of Words
          22.2 Morphological Operations
          22.3 Morphological Typology
          22.4 Summary
          22.5 Key-Word
          22.6 Review Questions
          22.7 Further Readings

        Objectives

        After reading this Unit students will be able to:
        •    Understand the Atoms of Words
        •    Discuss Morphological Operations
        •    Explain Morphological Typology
        Introduction

        In linguistics, morphology is the identification, analysis and description of the structure of a given
        language’s morphemes and other linguistic units, such as words, affixes, parts of speech, intonation/
        stress, or implied context (words in a lexicon are the subject matter of lexicology).
        Morphological typology represents a method for classifying languages according to the ways by
        which morphemes are used in a language—from the analytic that use only isolated morphemes,
        through the agglutinative (“stuck-together”) and fusional languages that use bound morphemes
        (affixes), up to the polysynthetic, which compress lots of separate morphemes into single words.
        While words are generally accepted as being (with clitics) the smallest units of syntax, it is clear that
        in most languages, if not all, words can be related to other words by rules (grammars). For example,
        English speakers recognize that the words dog and dogs are closely related—differentiated only by
        the plurality morpheme “-s”, which is only found bound to nouns, and is never separate. Speakers of
        English (a fusional language) recognize these relations from their tacit knowledge of the rules of
        word formation in English. They infer intuitively that dog is to dogs as cat is to cats’, similarly, dog is to
        dog catcher as dish is to dishwasher, in one sense. The rules understood by the speaker reflect specific
        patterns, or regularities, in the way words are formed from smaller units and how those smaller
        units interact in speech. In this way, morphology is the branch of linguistics that studies patterns of
        word formation within and across languages, and attempts to formulate rules that model the
        knowledge of the speakers of those languages.
        A language like Classical Chinese instead uses unbound (“free”) morphemes, but depends on post-
        phrase affixes, and word order to convey meaning. However, this cannot be said of present-day
        Mandarin, in which most words are compounds (around 80%), and most roots are bound.
        In the Chinese languages, these are understood as grammars that represent the morphology of the
        language. Beyond the agglutinative languages, a polysynthetic language like Chukchi will have words
        composed of many morphemes: The word “t mey ŋ levtp γ t rk n” is composed of eight
                                                            e
                                                               e
                                                      e
                                                                  e
                                                e
                                         LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       289
   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300