Page 169 - DMTH401_REAL ANALYSIS
P. 169

Unit 12: Properties of Continuous Functions




          Let S denote the collection of all real numbers x in [a, b] such that f(x) < K. Clearly S contains a, so  Notes
          S  and b is an upper bound for S. Hence, by completeness property of R, S has least upper bound
          and let us denote this least upper bound by c. Then a  c  b. We want to show that f(c) = K.
          Since f is continuous on [a, b], f is continuous at c. Therefore, given  > 0, there exists a 6 > 0 such
          that whenever x is in [a, b] and |x – c| < 6, |f(x) – f(c) ( < G,

          i.e.,  f(c) –  < f(x) < f(c) + .                                      .. . (4)
          If c  b, we can clearly assume that c + 6 < b. Now c is the least upper bound of S. So c –  is not
          ‘an upper bound’ of S. Hence, there exists a y in S such that c – 6 < y  c. Clearly |y – c| <  and
          so by (4) above, we have
                f(c) –  < f(y) < f(c) + .
          Since y is in S, therefore f(y) < K. Thus, we get

               f(c) – S < K
          If now c = b then K –  < K < f(b) = f(c), i.e., K < f(c) + E. If c  b, then c < b; then there exists an x
          such that c < x < c + 6, 6, x [a, b] and for this x, f(x) < f(c) +  by (4) above. Since x > c, K  f(x), for
          otherwise x would be in S which will imply that c is not an upper bound of S. Thus, again we
          have K  f(x) < f(c) + E.

          In any case,
                   K < f(c) +                                                     ...(6)
          Combining (5) and (6), we get for every  > 0
               f (c) –  < K < f(c) + 

          which proves that K = f(c), since  is arbitrary while K, f(c) are fixed. In fact, when f(a) < K < f(b)
          and f(c) = K, then a < c < b.
          Corollary 1: If f is a continuous function on the closed interval [a, b] and If  f(a) and f(b) have
          opposite signs (i.e., f(a) f(b) < 0), then there is a point x  in ]a, b[ at which f vanishes. (i.e., f(x) = 0).
                                                    0                             0
          Corollary follows by taking K = 0 in the theorem.
          Corollary 2: Let f be a continuous function defined on a bounded closed  interval [a, b] with
          values in [a, b]. Then there exists a point c in [a, b] such that f(c) = c. (i.e., there exists a fixed point
          c for the function f on [a, b]).

          Proof: If f(a) = a or f(b) = b then there is nothing to prove. Hence, we assume that f(a)  a and f(b)
           b.
          Consider the function g defined by g(x) = f(x) – x, x [a, b]. The function being the difference of
          two continuous functions, is continuous on [a, b]. Further, since f(a), f(b) are in [a, b], f(a) > a
          (since f(a)  a, f(a) [a, b]) and f(b) < b. (Since f(b)  b, f(b) [a, b]). So, g(a) > 0 and g(b) < 0. Hence,
          by Corollary 1, there exists a c in ]a, b[ such that g(c) = 0, i.e., f(c) = c. Hence, there exists ac in [a,
          b] such that f(c) = c.

          The above Corollary 1  helps us sometimes to locate some  of the roots of  polynomials.  We
          illustrate this with the following example.


                                    4
                 Example: The equation x  + 2x – 11 = 0 has a real root lying between 1 and 2.
          Solution: The function f(x) = x  + 2x – 11 is a continuous function on the closed interval [1, 2],
                                  4
          f(1) = –8 and f(2) = 9. Hence, by Corollary 1, there exists an x  ]1, 2[ such that f(x ) = 0, i.e., x  is
                                                          0                0        0
          a real root of the equation x  + 2x – 11 = 0 lying in the interval ]1, 2[.
                                4


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   163
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174