Page 364 - DMTH401_REAL ANALYSIS
P. 364

Real Analysis




                    Notes          Proof: Since f is differentiable, f is continuous. Define g (x) = [f(x + 1/n) – f(x)]/(1/n) and use [108].
                                                                             n
                                   Now we will show that a monotone real function (increasing or decreasing) is continuous and
                                   differentiable at most of the points.

                                   Let –¥  a < b  ¥ and let f: (a, b)    be a monotone function. Then, Y = {x   (a, b) : f is
                                   discontinuous at x} is a countable set (possibly empty).
                                   Proof: Suppose f is increasing. If x  Y, then necessarily f(x–) < f(x+), and we may choose a rational
                                   number between f(x–) and f(x+). This gives a one-one map from Y to Q.
                                   Definition: A collection  of non-degenerate intervals is a Vitali cover for a set X   if for each
                                    > 0, the subcollection {I  : 0 < |I| < } is also a cover for X.
                                   [Vitali’s covering lemma] Let X   be such that m * L,1  [X] < ¥ and let  be a collection of intervals
                                   forming a Vitali cover for X. Then,

                                   (i)  There are countably many pairwise disjoint intervals I, I ,…   such that m *  [X\U I ] = 0.
                                                                                  1  2             L,1   n n
                                   (ii)  For every  > 0, there exist finitely many pairwise disjoint intervals I ,…,I   with the
                                                                                                1
                                                                                                    k
                                       property that  m * L,1  [X\   k n 1 n
                                                             I ] < .
                                                           =
                                                  *
                                   Proof: Write µ* =  m L,1  for simplicity.
                                   (i)  With out loss of generality assume that every I   is a (non-degenerate) closed interval.
                                       Choose an open set U   such that X  U and µ*[U] < ¥. Every x  X has a neighbourhood
                                       contained in U. Hence  = {I  : I  U} is also a vitali cover for X. We will choose the
                                       intervals I  inductively. Let   = sup{|J|: J  } (note that   < µ*[U] < ¥) and let I    be
                                               n              0                        0                1
                                       any interval with |I | >  /2. Suppose that we have chosen pairwise disjoint intervals
                                                        1    0
                                       I ,…,I   . If X     n  I , then we are done. Else, any x  X\   n  I  is at a positive distance
                                                        =
                                                                                          =
                                        1   n           i 1 i                            i 1 i
                                       from the closed set    n  I . Let   = sup{| J|: J   and I   J = Ø for 1  i  n}. Then 0 <   
                                                         =
                                                        i 1 i   n                  i                         n
                                       µ*[U] < ¥. Let I     be an interval with |I | >  /2. We will show that the sequence (I )
                                                   n + 1                  n+1   n                             n
                                       does the job.
                                   Observation: For every J  , there is n   such that I   J  Ø (|I |  µ*[U] < ¥ so that
                                                                                n            n
                                   (|I |)  0, and hence there is n   such that |I | < | J|/2).
                                     n                                   n
                                   Let Y = X\  ¥  I  and  > 0. We claim that µ*[Y] < . Let c  be the midpoint of I  and let Y    be
                                             =
                                             n 1 n                              n               n        n
                                   the closed interval with midpoint c  and |Y | = 6|I | (this Y  may not be in ). Let k   be so
                                                               n      n     n      n
                                                                                                             I .
                                   that  å ¥ n k 1 |I | < /6. If x  Y, then in particular x does not belong to the closed set   k n 1 n
                                                                                                            =
                                          +
                                         =
                                             n
                                   Choose J   with x  J and I   J = Ø for 1  n  k. By our observation above, I   J  Ø for some
                                                          n                                      m
                                   m  k + 1. Let m be the smallest such number. Then |J|     < 2|I | and hence |x – c |  |J| +
                                                                                 m–1   m               m
                                   |I |  3|I |. Therefore, x  Y . We have shown that Y    ¥  Y . Since  å ¥  |Y |  6 å  ¥
                                                                                                 +
                                                                                                =
                                                                                                              +
                                                                                   =
                                                                                     +
                                                                                                            =
                                    m      m               m                       n k 1  n    n k 1  n    n k 1
                                   |I | < , we have proved that µ*[Y] < .
                                    n
                                   Now, note that the argument given above actually shows that for every  > 0, there is k   such
                                   that µ* [X\   k  I ] < . Hence we have established (ii) also.
                                              =
                                             n 1 n
                                   When a mathematical problem is difficult, it is a good idea to divide the problem into many
                                   subcases and to treat  each case separately. If f : (a, b)    is a  function, then the four Dini
                                   derivatives of f at a point x  (a, b) are defined as follows.
                                                                      f(x h) f(x)
                                                                         +
                                                                            -
                                                         D f(x) = limsup              [upper right derivative]
                                                          +
                                                                 h  0+    h
                                                                           -
                                                                        +
                                                                     f(x h) f(x)
                                                         D f(x) = lim inf             [lower right derivative]
                                                          +
                                                                   0
                                                                 h  +    h
          358                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369