Page 14 - DMTH403_ABSTRACT_ALGEBRA
P. 14

Unit 1: Generating Sets




          Note that                                                                             Notes

          (i)  [1] and [6] are not disjoint. In fact, [1] = [6]. Similarly, [2] = [7], and so on.
          (ii)  N = [I] U [2] U [3] U [4] U [5], and the sets on the right hand side arc mutually disjoint.
          We will prove these observations in general in the following theorem.
          Theorem 1: Let R be an equivalence relation on a set S. For a  S, let [a] denote the equivalence
          class of a. Then
          (a)  a [a],
          (b)  b  [a]  [a] = [b],


          (c)   S =   [a]
                   a S
          (d)    if a, b  S, then [a]  [b] =  or [a] = [b].

          Proof: (a)     Since R is an equivalence relation, it is reflexive.
                aRa  V  a  S.   a  [a].
          (b)  Firstly, assume that b "  [a]. We will show that [a]  [b] and [b]  [a]. For this, let x  [a].
          Then xRa.
          We also know that aRb. Thus, by transitivity of R, we have xRb, i.e., x  [b].  [a]  [b]. We can
          similarly show that [b]  [a].
                [a] = [b].

          Conversely, assume that [a] = [b]. Then b  [b] = [a].  b  [a].

          (c)  Since [a]  S V a  S,    [a]  S .
                                 a S
          Conversely, let x  S. Then x  [x] by (a) above. [x] is one of the sets in the collection whose union

          is    [a] .
            a S

          Hence, x     [a] . So, S     [a] .
                    a S       a S
          Thus, S     [a]  and   [a]  S , proving (c).
                   a S     a S
          (d)  Suppose [a]    [b]  . Let x  [a]    [b].
          Then x  [a] and x  [b]

           [x] = [a] and [x] = [b], by (b) above.
           [a] = [b].
          Note that, in Theorem 1, distinct sets on the right hand side of (c) are mutually disjoint because
          of (d). Therefore, (c) expresses S as a union of mutually disjoint subsets of S; that is, we have a
          partition of S into equivalence classes.

          Let us look at some more examples of partitioning a set into equivalence classes.





                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    7
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19