Page 181 - DMTH403_ABSTRACT_ALGEBRA
P. 181

Abstract Algebra




                    Notes          Proof: (a) Since (0) is an ideal of R , by Theorem 3(b) we know that f-1({o}) is an ideal of R . But
                                                              2
                                                                                                           1
                                   f ({o}) = Ker f.
                                   -1
                                   Thus, we have shown that Ker f is an ideal of R .
                                                                         1
                                   (b) Since R  is a subring of R , f(R ) is a subring of R , by Theorem 2(a). Thus, Im f is a subring of
                                           1
                                                                           2
                                                             1
                                                         1
                                   R .
                                    2
                                   This result is very useful for showing that certain sets are ideals. For example, from Theorem 5
                                   you can immediately say that  {0,3}  is an ideal of Z . As we go along you will see more examples
                                                                           6
                                   of this use of Theorem 5.
                                   Let us look a little more closely at the kernel of a homomorphism. In fact, let us prove a result
                                   analogous to Theorem 4 of Unit 6.
                                   Theorem 6: Let f : R  – R  be a homomorphism. Then f is injective iff Ker f = {0}
                                                      2
                                                   1
                                   Proof: f is injective iff f is an injective group homomorphism from (R , +) into (R , + ). This is true
                                                                                         1
                                                                                                  2
                                   iff Ker f = {0}, by Theorem 4 of Unit 6. So, our result is proved.
                                   So far we have seen that given a ring homomorphism f : R — S, we can obtain an ideal of R,
                                   namely, Ker f. Now, given an ideal I of a ring R can we define a homomorphism f so that
                                   Ker f = I?

                                   The following theorem answers this question. Before going to the theorem recall the definition
                                   of quotient rings.

                                   Theorem 7: If I is an ideal of a ring R, then there exists a ring homomorphism f : R  R/I whose
                                   kernel is I.

                                   Proof: Let us define f : R  R/I by f(a) = a + I for all a  R. Let us see iff is a homomorphism. For
                                   this take any a, b  R. Then

                                   f(a + b) = (a + b) + I = (a + I) + (b + I) = f(a) + f(b), and
                                   f(ab) = ab + I = (a + I) (b + I) = f(a) f(b).
                                   Thus, f is a homomorphism.

                                   Further, Kerf = {a  R | f(a) = 0 + I} = { a  R | a + I = I }
                                                      = {a  R | a  I} = I .
                                   Thus, the theorem is proved.

                                   Also note that the homomorphism f is onto.
                                   We call the homomorphism defined in the proof above the canonical (or natural) homomorphism
                                   from R onto R/I.
                                   Now let us look at the behaviour of the composition of homomorphisms. We are sure you find
                                   the following result quite unsurprising.
                                   Theorem 8: Let R , R  and R  be rings and f : R  — R , and g : R   R  be ring homomorphisms.
                                                                            2
                                                                        1
                                                                                     2
                                                         3
                                                 1
                                                   2
                                                                                          3
                                   Then  their  composition  gof  :  R     R   given  by  (gof  (x)  =  g(f(x))  for  all  x    R   is  a  ring
                                                             1
                                                                                                      1
                                                                   3
                                   homomorphism.
                                   The  proof  of  this  result  is  on  the  same  lines  as  the  proof  of  the  corresponding  result  in
                                   Unit 6.
          174                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186