Page 31 - DMTH403_ABSTRACT_ALGEBRA
P. 31

Abstract Algebra




                    Notes          Conversely, if we are given a table, we can define a binary operation on S. For example, we can
                                   define the operation * on S = {1, 2, 3} by the following table.

                                            *                  1                  2                  3
                                            1                  1                  2                  3
                                            2                  3                  1                  2
                                            3                  2                  3                  1

                                   From this table we see that, for instance, 1 * 2 = 2 and 2 * 3 = 2.

                                   Now 2 * 1 = 3 and 1 * 2 = 2. 2 * 1  1 * 2. That is, * is not commutative.
                                   Again, (2 * 1) * 3 = 3 * 3 = 1 and 2 * (1 * 3) = 2

                                         (2 * 1) * 3  2 * (1 * 3).    , * is not associative.
                                   See how much information a mere table can give !

                                   Now consider the following definition.
                                   Definition: Let * be a binary operation on a non-empty set S and let a,, . . . . . .,a ,  S. We define
                                                                                                 k+1
                                   the product a, * . ... .. * a , as follows:
                                                      k+1
                                   If k = 1, a, * a  is a well defined element in S.
                                             2
                                   If a  * ..... * a, is defined, then
                                     l
                                   a, * .... . . * a  = (a, * . ..... * a,) * a k+1
                                            k+l
                                   We use this definition in the following result.

                                   Theorem 2: Let a,, ...... ,a m+n  be elements in a set S with an associative binary operation *. Then
                                   (a, * ..,...* a,) * (a,,, * ...... * a m+n ) = a  * ...... * a m+n .
                                                             1
                                   Proof: We use induction on n. That is, we will show that the statement is true for n = 1. Then,
                                   assuming that it is true for n – 1, we will prove it for n.
                                   If n = 1, our definition above gives us
                                   (a, .......* a,) * a,,, = a, *...... * a m+1 .

                                   Now, assume that
                                   (a, *.......* a,) * (a,,, ........ a m+n–1 ) = a, * ....... a,,,,
                                   Then
                                   (a, * ......... * a) * (a,,, .......... a)

                                   = (a  *.........* a,) * ((a m+1  * ..... * a m+n–1 ) * a m+n )
                                      1
                                   = ( (a, *......* a,,) * (a,,, *......* a,,,) ) * a, since * is associative
                                   = (a ......... a m+n–1 ) * a m+n  by induction
                                      1
                                   = a, * ....... a, by definition.
                                   Hence, the result holds for all n.

                                   We will use Theorem 2 quite often in this course, without explicitly referring to it.
                                   Now that we have discussed binary operations let us talk about groups.







          24                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36