Page 269 - DMTH502_LINEAR_ALGEBRA
P. 269

Unit 24: Inner Product and Inner Product Spaces




          also belongs to W . Since cE  + E  is a vector in W, it follows from Theorem 4 that   Notes
                                        E(c  +  ) = cE  +E .
          Of course, one may also prove the linearity of E by using (11) . Again let   be any vector in V.
          Then E  is the unique vector in W such that   – E  is in W  . Thus E  = 0 when   is in  W  .
          Conversely,   is in W when E  = 0. Thus W is the null space of E. The equation
                                      = E  +   – E

          show that V = W +  W ; moreover,  M  W = {0}. For if   is vector in M  W , then ( | ) = 0.
          Therefore,   = 0, and V is the direct sum of W and  W  .
          Corollary: Under the conditions of the theorem, I – E is orthogonal projection of V on  W  .  It is
          an idempotent linear transformation of V onto W with null space W.
          Proof: We have already seen that the mapping  E is the orthogonal projection of V on
           W  . Since E is a linear transformation, this projection on W is the linear transformation I – E.
          From its geometric properties one sees that I – E is an idempotent transformation of V onto W.
          This also follows from the computation
                           (I – E) (I – E) = I – E – E + E 2

                                     = I – E.
          Moreover, (I – E)  = 0 if and only if   = E , and this is the case if and only if   is in W. Therefore
          W is the null space of I – E.

          The Gram-Schmidt process may now be described geometrically in the following way. Given an
          inner product space V and vectors  , . . . ,   in V, let P  (k > 1) be the orthogonal projection of V
                                       1     n        k
          on the orthogonal complement of the subspace spanned by  , . . . ,   , and set P  = I. Then the
                                                           1     k – 1     1
          vectors one obtains by applying the orthogonalization process to  , . . . ,  , are defined by the
                                                                1     n
          equations
                                      = P  ,        1 k n .
                                    k   k k
          Theorem 5 implies another result known as Bessel’s inequality.
          Corollary: Let { , . . .,  } be an orthogonal set of non-zero vectors in an inner product space V.
                        1     n
          If   is any vector in V, then
                                                  2
                                             ( |  )
                                                k      2
                                                 2
                                          k    k
          and equality holds if and only if
                                            ( |  )
                                       =       k 2  k .
                                          k   k
                                  2
          Proof: Let   =  |   /       . Then   =   +   where ( / ) = 0. Hence
                            k    k   k
                      k
                                     2     2   2
                                       =        .
          It now suffices to prove that

                                                 2
                                            ( |  )
                                     2          k
                                       =        2  .
                                          k    k

                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   263
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274