Page 239 - DMTH503_TOPOLOGY
P. 239
Unit 28: Compactness in Metric Spaces
In this event (1) takes the form Notes
n
X S ...(2)
( i x )
i 1
Let {G : i } be an open cover of X which is known to be sequentially compact so that, by
i
theorem (lebesgue covering lemma), a Lebesgue number, say, for the cover {G} . Set = 3.
i i
The diameter of an open sphere of radius r is less than 2r.
i.e., d(S (x )) < 2 = 2.
i 3
d(S (x ) <
i
By definition of Lebesgue number, an open set
G {G : i } s.t. S (x ) G for 1 k n.
ik i k ik
n n
From which we get S ( k x ) G ik
k 1 k 1
n
On using (2), X G ik ...(3)
k 1
But X is a universal set,
n
G X ...(4)
ik
k 1
n
Combining (3) and (4), we get X = G .
ik
k 1
This implies that the family {G : 1 K n} is an open cover of X.
ik
Thus the open cover {G : i } of X is reducible to a finite the subcover {G : 1 K n} showing
i ik
thereby X is compact.
Sequentially compact compact Countably compact
Theorem 7: A metric space (X, d) is compact iff it is complete and totally bounded.
Proof: If X is a compact metric space then X is complete. The fact that X is totally bounded is a
consequence of the fact that the covering of X by all open - balls must contain a finite
subcovering.
Conversely, Let X be complete and totally bounded.
To prove: X is sequentially compact.
Let <x > be sequence of points of X. We shall construct a subsequence of <x > i.e. a Cauchy
n n
sequence, so that it necessarily converges.
First cover X by finitely many balls of radius 1. At least one of these balls, say B , contains x for
1 n
infinitely many values of n. Let J be the subset of Z consisting of those indices n for which
1 +
x B .
n 1
LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY 233