Page 39 - DSOC402_SOCIOLOGY_OF_KINSHIP_ENGLISH
P. 39

Unit  5:  Approaches to the Study of Kinship: Structural Functional





                  their existence because such structures possess more properties of adaptability. Durkheem was   Notes
                  influenced with his views these functional approach, principle and system.
                  Emile Durkheem—The ultra-modern functionalism is more indebted to  Durkheem than to
                  Spenser. Like Spenser, Durkheem was also very much influenced with biological concept in his
                  preliminary write-ups. His preliminary views were directly influenced by Spensor. Durkheem
                  has expressed his scientific study system in his book the ‘Rules of Sociology Methods’ and in his
                  articles. He help in making this principle attractive for sociologists and social humanists. Dur-
                  kheem has made clear differentiation in function of labour division and its reasons in the second
                  chapter of his book on labour division. The function of labour division is a variation of society.
                  Moral density increases as a result of the pressure of population. He had expressed following
                  logics in this regard:—
                  (i) Where the pressure of population and social interaction will increase, there, the control made
                  of simple segmented society will be shattered and there will be increase in competition which
                  will became a danger to the society.
                  (ii) To reduce  or control  of  this increased  competion  and  hostility specialised  functions  are
                  adopted which makes persons more interdependent on one-another. In this way, the situation
                  arrives to adopt the morality of mutual responsibility. The function he told is that the division
                  of labour increase on the increase of population pressure which increases specialisation and
                  internal mutual interdependency increases, due to which the members of the society have to
                  co-operative and which reduces hostility and competition and management establishes in the
                  society. He also established the same in the study of religion also that function of religion estab-
                  lishes unity in the society.
                  Upto the time of Durkheem, functional approaches were not established in social sciences—es-
                  pecially in sociology and Social Humanity but remarkable influence of his views were noticed
                  on its development.




                             What is the distinction between the function of labour division and its reason?



                  Contribution of Merton
                  R.K. Merton had made notable contribution to structural-functional approach, system, analysis
                  and principle through his world famous book ‘Social Theory and Social Structure.’ First of all, he
                  had made critical evaluation of the views, principles and agreements through this approach of
                  sociologist and social humanists came earlier to him, thereafter he presented an amended form
                  of function system, which is as following—

                  Merton’s Critical Evaluation of Predecessor Functionalists

                  Prior to the presentation of the functional system of himself, Merton had critically evaluated
                  Durkheem, Redcliff Brown, Malinovisky, Davis, Moor and Klukhaun, etc., which are as under—
                  Merton wrote, “These functionalists had adopted three mutually related postulates mainly in
                  general form of functional approach which are now proved to be useless and controversial.”
                  These are as under—(1) Postulate of functional unity of the society (2) Agreement of universal
                  functionality (3) Agreement of Indispensibility







                                            LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       33
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44