Page 143 - DCOM102_DMGT101_PRINCIPLES_AND_PRACTICES_OF_MANAGEMENT
P. 143

Pretty Bhalla, Lovely Professional University                                 Unit 8: Span of Management





                             Unit 8: Span of Management                                         Notes


             CONTENTS
             Objectives
             Introduction

             8.1  Graicunas’ Theory
             8.2  Impact of Span of Management
             8.3  Factors Determining Span of Management

             8.4  Centralisation and Decentralisation
                 8.4.1   Centralisation
                 8.4.2   Decentralisation
                 8.4.3   Centralised and Decentralised Organisations
             8.5  Summary

             8.6  Keywords
             8.7  Self Assessment
             8.8  Review Questions

             8.9  Further Readings
          Objectives


          After studying this unit, you will be able to:
               Discuss the Graicunas Theory
               Access the impact of span of management
               Identify factors determining span of management

               Explain the concept of centralisation and decentralisation

          Introduction

          The term ‘span of management’ is also known as ‘span of control’, ‘span of supervision’ and
          ‘span of authority’. It represents a numerical limit of ‘subordinates to be supervised and controlled
          by a manager. It is an important principle of sound organisation. This principle is based on the
          theory of  relationships propounded by V.A.  Graicunas, a  French management  consultant.
          Graicunas analyzed superior-subordinate relationship and developed a mathematical formula
          based on the geometric increase in complexities of managing as the number of subordinates
          increases.

          8.1 Graicunas’ Theory

          Graicunas showed mathematically that a number of direct, group and cross relationships exist
          between a manager and his subordinates. The number of these relationships increase ith the
          increase in the number of the subordinates. He said that an executive having four subordinates





                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   135
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148