Page 121 - DCOM103_COMMERCIAL_LAW
P. 121

Commercial Law




                    Notes          3.   the nature of agency is such that it cannot be accomplished without the appointment of a
                                       sub-agent;
                                   4.   where the nature of the job assigned to the agent is purely clerical and does not involve
                                       the exercise of discretion, e.g., if Anthony is appointed to type certain papers, because of
                                       lack of time, he assigns the job to another equally competent typist Bharat, the delegation
                                       is valid;

                                   5.   in an unforeseen emergency.
                                   Under the above-mentioned circumstances stipulated by S.190, if agent appoints another person
                                   in the matter of the agency, that other person may assume the position of either a sub-agent
                                   or a substituted agent. Section 191 states that a sub-agent is a person employed by and acting
                                   under the control of the original agent in the business of agency. Since the sub-agent is appointed
                                   by the act and under the control of the agent, there is no privity of contract between the sub-
                                   agent and the principal. The sub-agent, therefore, cannot sue the principal for remuneration
                                   and, similarly the principal cannot sue the sub-agent for any moneys due from him. Each of
                                   them can proceed against his immediate contracting party,  viz., the agent except where the
                                   sub-agent is guilty of fraud. In that case, the principal has a concurrent right to proceed against
                                   the agent and the sub-agent. A sub-agent properly appointed, however, can represent the
                                   principal and bind him for his acts as if he were agent originally appointed by the principal. But
                                   where agent, without having the authority to do so, has appointed a sub-agent, the principal is
                                   not represented by or responsible for the acts of such a sub-agent. The sub-agent can only bind
                                   the agent by contracts entered into with third parties.
                                   Where agent appoints or names another person for being appointed as agent in his place, such
                                   person is called a substituted agent (S.194).


                                         Examples:
                                   1.   Amar directs Bharat, his solicitor, to sell his estate by auction and to employ an auctioneer
                                       for the purpose. Bharat names Cooper, an auctioneer, to conduct the sale. Cooper is not a
                                       sub-agent, but is Amar’s agent for the conduct of the sale.
                                   2.   Amar authorises Bharat, a merchant in Calcutta, to recover the money due to Amar from
                                       Cooper and Co. Bharat instructs Dalip, a solicitor to take proceedings against Cooper and
                                       Co. for the recovery of the money. Dalip is not a sub-agent but is a solicitor for Amar.

                                   12.4 Duties and Rights of Agent


                                   Duties of Agent

                                   The duties of agent towards his principal are:
                                   1.   To conduct the business of agency according to the principal’s directions (S.211): The duty
                                       of the agent must be literally complied with, i.e., the agent is not supposed to deviate
                                       from the directions of the principal even for the principal’s benefit. If he does so, any loss

                                       occasioned thereby shall have to be borne by the agent, whereas any surplus must be
                                       accounted for to the principal.


                                                Examples: (i) Anil is directed by his principal to warehouse the goods at a
                                        particular warehouse. He warehouses a portion of the goods at another place, equally

                                        good but cheaper. The goods are destroyed by fire. Anil, the agent, is liable to make good
                                        the loss.





          114                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126