Page 47 - DCOM103_COMMERCIAL_LAW
P. 47

Commercial Law




                    Notes
                                          Example: (a) A agrees to transfer certain properties to be held by T in trust for the benefi t
                                   of B. B can enforce the agreement (i.e., the trust) even though he is not a party to the agreement
                                   [M. K. Rapai v. John, AIR (1965) Ker. 203].
                                   (b) A husband who was separated from his wife executed a separation deed by which he promised
                                   to pay to the trustees all expenses for the maintenance of his wife. Held, the agreement created a
                                   trust in favour of the wife and could be enforced [Gandy v. Gandy (1884) 30 Ch. D. 57].
                                   (c) A had a son SA and B had a daughter DB. A agreed with B that in consideration of the
                                   marriage of DB with SA, he (A) would pay to DB, his daughter-in-law, an allowance of ` 500 a
                                   month in perpetuity. He created a charge on certain properties for the payment and conferred
                                   power on DB to enforce it. Held, DB, although no party to the agreement, was clearly entitled to
                                   receiver the arrears of the allowance [Khwaja Mohd. Khan v. Hussani Begum, (1910) 32 All. 410].
                                   (2) Marriage settlement, Partition or other family arrangements. When an arrangement is made
                                   in connection with marriage, partition or other family arrangements and a provision is made for

                                   the benefit of a person, he may sue although he is not a party to the agreement.

                                          Example: (a) Two brothers, on a partition of joint properties, agreed to invest in equal
                                   shares a certain sum of money for the maintenance of their mother. Held, she was entitled to
                                   require her sons to make the investment [Shuppu Ammal v. Subramaniyam, (1910) 33 Mad. 2].
                                   (b) J’s wife deserted him because of his ill treatment. J entered into an agreement with his father-
                                   in-law to treat her properly or else pay her monthly maintenance. Subsequently she was again
                                   ill-treated and also driven out. Held, she was entitled to enforce the promise made by J to her
                                   father [Daropti v. Jaspat Rai, (1905) PR 17].

                                   (c) A mother agreed to pay to her younger son in the event of the failure by the elder son to
                                   pay to the younger son the amount which fell short of the younger son’s share in the assets left
                                   by their father. The agreement was made to purchase peace for the family. Held, it was a valid
                                   family arrangement creating liability of mother [Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Vijayaba, AIR (1979)
                                   S.C. 982].

                                   (3) Acknowledgement or estoppel. Where the promisor by his conduct, acknowledges or otherwise
                                   constitutes himself as an agent of a third party, a binding obligation is thereby incurred by him
                                   towards the third party.


                                          Example: A receives some money from T to be paid over to P. A admits of this receipt to
                                   P. P can recover the amount from A who shall be regarded as the agent of P.

                                   (4) Assignment of a contract. The assignee of rights and benefits under a contract not involving
                                   personal skill can enforce the contract subject to the equities between the original parties [Krishan
                                   Lal Sadhu v. Promila Bala, AIR (1928) Cal. 518]. Thus the holder in due course of a negotiable
                                   instrument can realise the amount on it even though there is no contract between him and the
                                   person liable to pay.
                                   (5) Contracts entered into through an agent. The principal can enforce the contracts entered into
                                   by his agent provided the agent acts within the scope of his authority and in the name of the
                                   principal.
                                   (6) Covenants running with the land. In cases of transfer of immovable property, the purchaser of
                                   land with notice that the owner of the land is bound by certain conditions or covenants created by
                                   an agreement affecting the land shall be bound by them although he was not party to the original
                                   agreement which contained the conditions or covenants [Tulk v. Moxhay (1919) 88 LJ KB 861].






          40                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52