Page 201 - DCOM106_COMPANY_LAW
P. 201

Company Law




                    Notes          need not  be a member of the company. (iii) The instrument appointing a proxy must be in
                                   writing and signed by the appointor. (iv) The proxy form must bear the date of the meeting.
                                   (v) No company can make it compulsory  for anyone  to lodge proxies earlier than 48 hours
                                   before the meeting. (vi) A proxy may be revoked before the person appointed has voted. (vii) A
                                   proxy can demand a poll. (viii) A proxy cannot vote against the wishes of his appointor.
                                   Secretarial work as regards proxies


                                    (a) Scrutinise the proxy forms to see whether they comply with the provisions of the Act, and
                                   the bye-laws and rules of the company. (b) Any proxies received after the stipulated time limit
                                   must be returned with a note that they cannot be accepted. (c) Any irregularities in proxy forms
                                   should be reported to chairman of the meeting, as he is the final authority to accept or reject
                                   them. (d) Each correct proxy form is countersigned by the secretary. (e) Enter the correct proxy
                                   forms in the register of proxies.  (f) Return  the proxy form to  the member  together with an
                                   admission card in the name of the proxy.

                                   12.5.4 Voting and Poll

                                   Unanimity on all matters before a meeting is always not obtained. In the absence of unanimity,
                                   the chairman wants  to know  the wishes  of the  persons  present  therein.  This  is known  as
                                   ascertaining the sense of the house and for this purpose; he has to put the matter before the house
                                   to the members. There are various methods which can be adopted by the chairman to put the
                                   matter to vote in order to ascertain the wishes of the members.
                                   In the case of a company, the Act prescribes two methods to ascertain the wishes of the members.
                                   These are:
                                   (i)  By Show of Hands:  Under this method, the chairman asks all those in favour of the
                                       resolution to raise their right hand and when that number is noted, asks all those against
                                       to do likewise. The chairman then declares the result of the voting indicating whether the
                                       proposal has been carried or lost.
                                   (ii)  By Poll: In company meetings, voting by poll is according to the number of shares held by
                                       a member. Under this method, every person present records his vote on a ballot paper and
                                       deposits it in the ballot box provided for that purpose. The counting of ballots cast for and
                                       against the motion reveals the results. This method ensures secrecy in casting votes. The
                                       voting by show of hands may not always reflect the opinion of members upon a value
                                       basis. Also, there may be a number of proxies who can vote only by poll and not by show
                                       of hands.

                                   Rules in respect of voting

                                   As per the provisions of the Act, rules regarding voting may be noted as follows:
                                   1.  Every holder of equity shares shall have a right to vote [s. 87(1)].
                                   2.  Right of an equity shareholder to vote cannot be prohibited on the ground that, he has not
                                       held his shares for any specified period before the meeting or on any other ground (s.182).
                                       In Ananthalakshmi vs. H. I. & F. Trust, AIR 1951 Mad. 927, a provision in the Articles of a
                                       company that only those shareholders would be entitled to vote whose names have been
                                       there on the register for two months before the date of the meeting was held to be  in
                                       contravention of the Act.
                                       The only ground on which the right to vote may be excluded is non-payment of calls by a
                                       member or other sums due against a member or where the company has exercised the
                                       right of lien on his shares (s.181).



          196                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206