Page 26 - DCOM106_COMPANY_LAW
P. 26

Unit 2: Meaning and Nature of a Company




               Where a company formed is against public interest or public policy: Where for the purpose  Notes
               of determining the character of the members, the Court may lift the corporate veil.


                 Example:  C  company was floated in London  for marketing tyres manufactured in
          Germany. The majority of C’s shares were held by the German nationals residing in Germany.
          During World War I, C company filed a suit against D company for the recovery of trade debt.
          The D company contended that C company was an alien enemy company (Germany being at
          war with England at that time) and that the payment of the debt would be a trading with the
          enemy. The Court agreed with the contention of the defendants [Daimler Co. Ltd. v. Continental
          Tyre and Rubber Co., (1916) 2AC 307].
               Where device of incorporation is used for some illegal or improper purpose: [PNB Finance
               Ltd. v. Shital Prasad Jain (1983) 54 Comp. Cas 66 (Delhi)]. S, the financial advisor of a
               financing public limited company was given a loan of    15 lakhs  by the company  to
               purchase  immovable properties in Delhi. A pronote with regard  to the same was also
               executed by S. S diverted the amount of the loan to three public limited companies floated
               by him and his son. These companies, in turn, applied the amount in purchasing immovable
               properties at New Delhi. The Delhi High Court refrained  the defendants from in any
               manner alienating, transferring, disposing of or encumbering the properties in question.
               Where the number of members falls below the statutory minimum: (i.e., seven in the case of
               a public company and two in the case of a private company) and the company continues to
               carry on business for more than six months while the number is so reduced. In such a case,
               every person who is a member of the company during  the time that it  so carries  on
               business after those six months and has knowledge of that fact, shall be severally liable to
               the creditors for the payment of the company’s debts contracted during that period. Such
               a member can be sued severally (i.e., directly) by the creditors of the company. Both the
               privileges of limited liability and that of the separate legal entity are lost. The creditors
               are permitted to look behind the company to the shareholders for the satisfaction of their
               claims (s.45).

               Where  prospectus includes  a fraudulent  misrepresentation:  In  case  of a  prospectus
               containing  fraudulent misrepresentation as to a material fact, Ss.  62 and 63 make  the
               promoters, directors, etc., personally liable not only in damages but they may even be
               prosecuted in terms of fine up to   50,000 or imprisonment up to 2 years or both.
               Where a negotiable instrument is signed by an officer  of a  company on behalf of  the
               company without mentioning the name of the company: Thereon, he is personally liable
               to the holder of the instrument, unless the company has already made the payment on the
               instrument [s.147 (4) (c)].
               Holding and Subsidiary Companies: (Ss. 212-213). In the eyes of law, the holding company
               and its subsidiaries are separate legal entities. However, in the following cases, a subsidiary
               company may lose its separate identity to a certain extent:
                    Where at the end of its financial year, a company has subsidiaries, it may lay before
                    its members in general meeting not only its own accounts, but also a set of group
                    accounts showing the profit or loss earned or suffered by the holding company and
                    its subsidiaries collectively and their collective state of affairs at the end of the year;
                    The  Central Government,  where it  feels desirable, may direct the holding  and
                    subsidiary companies to synchronize their financial years;
                    The Court may, on the facts of a case, treat a subsidiary company as merely a branch
                    or department of one large undertaking owned by the holding company.





                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   21
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31